The four plaintiffs claimed in 2011 that Apple had violated its privacy policy, saying the iPhone maker had designed its iOS environment to easily transmit personal information to third parties that collect and analyze such data without user consent or detection.
They also claimed that they suffered damages by paying too much money for their iPhones and by losing storage space, among other things, according to court documents.
U.S. District Judge Lucy H. Koh in San Jose, California dismissed the case.
"Plaintiffs must be able to provide some evidence that they saw one or more of Apple's alleged misrepresentations, that they actually relied on those misrepresentations, and that they were harmed thereby," Koh said in the November 25 ruling.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs and Apple either did not respond to requests for comment or declined to comment.
The case is one part of nationwide litigation Koh is overseeing that consolidates 19 related lawsuits.
The case is In re Apple Inc. iPhone/iPad Application Consumer Privacy Litigation, 11-md-02250, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose).
© Thomson Reuters 2013
Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.
Samsung Galaxy Watch 9 (44mm, LTE)
Starts from ₹44,999
Samsung Galaxy Watch 9 (40mm, LTE)
Starts from ₹37,999
Samsung Galaxy Watch 9 (40mm)
Starts from ₹37,999
Haier M70 Mini LED 65-inch
Starts from ₹74,990
CMF Buds Neo True Wireless Stereo (TWS) Earphones
Starts from ₹2,199
Xiaomi TV FX Mini LED 65
Starts from ₹64,999
IFA 2026: Lenovo Unveiled New IdeaPad, Yoga and ThinkBook Laptops
IFA 2026: Nvidia RTX Spark PCs, Local AI Tools Announced With October Launch Planned
Luna Band Now Available Globally: Check Price in India, Specifications and Features