Apple loses bid to dismiss state-specific ebook antitrust lawsuits

Advertisement
By Reuters | Updated: 16 April 2014 10:45 IST
Apple Inc on Tuesday lost an attempt to dismiss lawsuits by state attorneys general accusing it of conspiring with five major publishers to fix ebook prices.

U.S. District Judge Denise Cote's ruling paves the way for attorneys general in 33 states and territories to move forward, along with attorneys for consumers, in pursuing hundreds of millions of dollars in damages at a July 14 trial.

Following a non-jury trial, Cote in July found that Apple from 2009 to 2010 conspired with the publishers to raise ebook prices and impede competitors such as Amazon Inc.

Advertisement

The states had pursued the liability finding alongside the U.S. Justice Department without any objection by Apple and obtained a subsequent injunction against the iPad maker in September that called for the appointment of a compliance monitor.

But as the case moved into a damages phase, Apple argued that the states lacked standing to maintain an action for damages, arguing they had not alleged they had suffered any injury.

Cote, though, said it was easy to conclude the states had standing to move forward with the case.

"Apple has cited no authority to support the distinction it is advocating here between the standing to seek an end to an antitrust violation and the standing to seek damages for that violation," she wrote.

Advertisement

The states' case is being led by attorneys general in Texas and Connecticut. Jaclyn Falkowski, a spokeswoman for Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen, said in an email that the office was pleased with the decision.

A spokesman for Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The company has appealed the liability finding in the civil lawsuit and denies wrongdoing.

Advertisement

Attorneys for the plaintiffs are seeking $840 million in damages.

The publishers previously agreed to pay more than $166 million to settle related antitrust charges.

Advertisement

They included Lagardere SCA's Hachette Book Group Inc, News Corp's HarperCollins Publishers LLC, Penguin Group (USA) Inc, CBS Corp's Simon & Schuster Inc and Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck GmbH's Macmillan.

The case is In Re: Electronic Books Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 11-md-02293.

© Thomson Reuters 2014

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. These Old Galaxy Flagships Are Getting the Stable One UI 9 Update
  2. Redmi K100 Could Launch Soon at This Price: See Expected Specifications
  3. iPhone Duo Screen Repair Costs Almost as Much as an iPhone 18 Pro
  4. Here's How the Oppo Reno 17 Could Look: See Expected Specifications
  5. Oppo Wide-Folding Phone Key Display Features Tipped
  1. PS Plus Game Catalogue Will Add Mafia: The Old Country, Mycopunk, The Midnight Walk and More in October
  2. Oppo Wide-Folding Phone Key Display Features Tipped Ahead of Launch: Expected Specifications
  3. Google Play Store ‘Shop Devices’ Feature Goes Live in India With Pixel Phones and Accessories
  4. US Crypto Scam Crackdown Brings 241 Website Shutdowns by FBI, Brooklyn DA
  5. Logitech Starts Local Manufacturing in India, Products to Roll Out From Manesar Plant
  6. OnePlus Ace 7, Ace 7 Pro Listed on Google Supported Devices List Ahead of Launch
  7. iPhone Duo Screen Repair in India Costs Almost as Much as an iPhone 18 Pro
  8. DoT Mandates Caller Name Presentation for 5G and 4G Networks From Next Month
  9. iQOO Pad Pro 8.8 Launch Teased; Confirmed to Feature 9,020mAh Battery
  10. Oppo Reno 17 Design Spotted in Leaked Hands-On Image; Oppo Reno 17 Pro Unlikely to Launch in India
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.