Fitbit Ionic vs Casio G-Shock GBA900 comparison
|
|
|
|
| key specs |
| Display Size | 32mm | - |
| Compatible OS | Android, iOS | Android, iOS |
| Strap Material | Elastomer | - |
| Ideal For | Unisex | Unisex |
| Dial Shape | - | Round |
| general |
| Brand | Fitbit | Casio |
| Model | Ionic | G-Shock GBA900 |
| Release date | August 1, 2017 | May 13, 2021 |
| Strap Material | Elastomer | - |
| Size | Regular | Large |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Water Resistant | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance Depth | 50 metres | 200 Metres |
| Ideal For | Unisex | Unisex |
| Model Name | - | G-Shock GBA900 |
| Dial Shape | - | Round |
| Usage | - | Outdoor |
| Dial Material | - | Resin |
| dimensions |
| Weight (g) | 303.30 | 61.00 |
| Width | - | 51.3 |
| Height | - | 48.9 |
| Thickness | - | 16.6 |
| product details |
| Sensor | 3-axis Accelerometer, 3-axis Gyroscope, Optical Heart Rate Sensor, Altimeter, Ambient Light Sensor | accelerometer |
| Compatible Device | Android, iPhone | Android, iPhone |
| Notification | Yes | Yes |
| Notification Type | Vibration | - |
| Battery Type | Lithium Polymer | - |
| Charge Time | 120 minutes | - |
| Stand By Time | Upto 6 Days | - |
| Rechargeable Battery | Yes | - |
| Battery Life | - | 2 years |
| connectivity features |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | - |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Other Connectivity Features | NFC | - |
| platform and storage features |
| Operating System | Fitbit OS | - |
| Compatible Operating System | Android, iOS | Android, iOS |
| camera and display features |
| Display Resolution | 240x180 | - |
| Display Size | 32mm | - |
| fitness and watch functions |
| Step Count | Yes | Yes |
| Calorie Count | Yes | Yes |
| Heart Rate Monitor | Yes | - |
| Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Alarm Clock | Yes | Yes |
| Chronograph | Yes | - |
| Date & Time Display | Yes | Yes |
| Number of Buttons | 3 | - |
| ratings |
| Companion app Rating | - | |
| Battery life Rating | - | |
Popular Smartwatch Brands