English
Edition
हिंदी
বাংলা
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
മലയാളം
ગુજરાતી
मराठी
Deutsch
Française
Home
Volt
Forum
AI
Quick Read
Auto
News
Reviews
Features
Guide
Product Finder
Mobiles
Laptops
TV
Tablets
Smart Watches
Headphones
Cameras
Gaming Consoles
Smart Bands
Speakers
Smart Speakers
AC
Games
Refrigerator
Air Cooler
Air Purifier
Washing Machine
Inverter
Printer
Smart Rings
Compare
Mobiles
Laptops
TV
Tablets
Smart Watches
Headphones
Cameras
Gaming Consoles
Smart Bands
Speakers
Smart Speakers
AC
Games
Refrigerator
Air Cooler
Air Purifier
Washing Machine
Inverter
Printer
Smart Rings
Recharge
Broadband Plans
DTH Recharge
Mobile Recharge
More
Cryptocurrency Prices
Digital Gold
Gold Rate
DEALS
Amazon Sale
Flipkart Sale
Movies
Web Series
Service Centers
Smart Home
Finance
Club360
Silver Rate
Opinions
Petrol Price
Diesel Price
Finance Calculator
new
Samsung Ecosystem
Mobiles
Telecom
How To
Gaming
Entertainment
Crypto
Audio
TV
PC/Laptops
Hotdeals360
Tablets
Science
Wearables
5G
Home
Audio
Headphones & Headset Finder
Compare Headphones & Headsets
Lava Probuds N2 Wireless Earphones vs Philips SHL3005BK/00 Wired Headphones
Lava Probuds N2 Wireless Earphones
vs
Philips SHL3005BK/00 Wired Headphones
comparison
Show Only Differences
Highlight Differences
Lava Probuds N2 Wireless Earphones
Philips SHL3005BK/00 Wired Headphones
key specs
Colour
Black
Black
Headphone Type
In-Ear
Over-Ear
Microphone
Yes
Yes
Connectivity
Wireless
Wired
Type
Earphones
Headphones
general
Brand
Lava
Philips
Model
Probuds N2 Wireless Earphones
SHL3005BK/00 Wired Headphones
Release date
December 13, 2021
January 1, 2017
Color
Black
-
Type
Earphones
Headphones
Headphone Type
In-Ear
Over-Ear
Connectivity
Wireless
Wired
Colour
-
Black
Model Number
-
SHL3005BK/00
product details
Microphone
Yes
Yes
Driver Type
Dynamic
-
Driver Size (mm)
10
32
Water Resistant
IPX4
-
Weight (g)
25.00
140.50
Cord Length (Metres)
-
1.2
sound features
Impedance (Ohms)
32
24
Sensitivity (dB)
102
106
Signal to Noise Ratio (dB)
94
-
Frequency Response Range
20Hz-20,000Hz
20Hz-20,000Hz
connectivity features
Bluetooth
Yes
-
Bluetooth Version
5
-
battery features
Charging Port
USB Type-C
-
Charging Time (Hrs)
2
-
Battery Life (Hrs)
12
-
Battery Capacity (mAh) Earpieces
110
-
Popular Headphones & Headset Brands
Audio-Technica
boAt
Boult Audio
Creative
Jabra
JBL
Logitech
Noise
Panasonic
Philips
Ptron
Samsung
Sennheiser
Sony
Zebronics
RELATED STORIES
Lava Probuds N2 Neckband Earphones With Upto 12-Hour Music Playback Time Launched in India
Advertisement
TRENDING
Pixel 11 Pro and Pixel 11 Pro XL Leaked Images Reveal Design From Various Angles
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold Appears in Official-Looking Renders Ahead of Launch
The LG TV and LG Soundbar Combo Does Things No Other Pairing Can
Nothing Phone (4a) Buyers May Have to Pay Rs. 3,000 More From August 1
OnePlus 16 Launch Confirmed; Design and Gaming Features Teased Ahead of Debut
OnePlus N6x With a 7,000mAh Battery Arrives in India at This Price
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G Will Launch in India on This Date: See Price
Moto Pad 70 Groove With 9 JBL Pro Speakers, 10,200mAh Battery Launched in India
About Us
Sitemaps
Feedback
Archives
Contact Us
RSS
Advertise
Career
Privacy Policy
Ethics
Editorial Policy
Terms & Conditions
Complaint Redressal
Gadgets 360 is available in
English
Hindi
বাংলা
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
मराठी
ગુજરાતી
മലയാളം
Deutsch
Française
Follow Us
Facebook
Twitter
Youtube
Instagram
WhatsApp
Rss
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.
Trending Products
»
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
Starts from
₹33,499
JBL New Live 780NC Wireless Headphones
Starts from
₹15,999
Vivo T5x 5G
Starts from
₹26,499
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
Starts from
₹29,999
OPPO Reno 16
Starts from
₹61,999
Moto G37
Starts from
₹14,999
Latest Tech News
»
Anthropic Says Claude AI Breached Three Organisations During Cybersecurity Testing
Samsung Working on New Galaxy Buds With Ear Hooks Design, Leak Suggests
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold Seen in New Leaked Renders With Pixel Glow Lighting, Moss Colourway
Bitcoin Holds Near $64,000 as Slowing US Inflation Fails to Lift ETF Demand