Tecno Camon Slim vs Tecno Spark Go 3 comparison
|
|
|
|
| key specs |
| Display | 6.78-inch | 6.74-inch |
| Front Camera | 32-megapixel | 8-megapixel |
| Rear Camera | 50-megapixel | 13-megapixel |
| RAM | 8GB | 4GB |
| Storage | 128GB | 64GB |
| Battery Capacity | 5600mAh | 5,000mAh |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| general |
| Brand | Tecno | Tecno |
| Model | Camon Slim | Spark Go 3 |
| Release date | June 22, 2026 | January 16, 2026 |
| AI Enabled | Yes | - |
| Launched in India | No | Yes |
| Form factor | Touchscreen | Touchscreen |
| Dimensions (mm) | 162.80 x 77.70 x 6.39 | 167.79 x 77.97 x 8.19 |
| IP rating | IP69 | IP64 |
| Battery capacity (mAh) | 5600 | 5,000 |
| Fast charging | 60W Fast Charging | 15W Fast Charging |
| Colours | Burgundy Red, Jungle Green, New Mondrian, Prism Black, Van Gogh Blue | Titanium Grey, Ink Black, Galaxy Blue Aurora Purple |
| Weight (g) | - | 182.60 |
| Removable battery | - | No |
| Wireless charging | - | No |
| display |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Resolution Standard | 1.5K | HD+ |
| Screen size (inches) | 6.78 | 6.74 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| hardware |
| Processor make | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | Unisoc T7250 |
| RAM | 8GB | 4GB |
| Internal storage | 128GB | 64GB |
| camera |
| Rear camera | 50-megapixel | 13-megapixel |
| Front camera | 32-megapixel | 8-megapixel |
| No. of Front Cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Pop-Up Camera | No | No |
| No. of Rear Cameras | - | 1 |
| Rear flash | - | Dual LED |
| software |
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Skin | HiOS 16.2 | - |
| connectivity |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | - |
| Active 4G on both SIM cards | Yes | - |
| USB Type-C | - | Yes |
| ratings |
| Overall NDTV Rating | - | Read Review |
| Design Rating | - | |
| Display Rating | - | |
| Software Rating | - | |
| Performance Rating | - | |
| Battery Life Rating | - | |
| Camera Rating | - | |
| Value for Money Rating | - | |