iBall Andi 3.5 Classique vs Micromax X265 comparison

Show Only Differences Highlight Differences	iBall Andi 3.5 Classique	Micromax X265
key specs
Display	3.50-inch	2.20-inch
Processor	ARM Cortex-A7	one-core
Front Camera	Unspecified	No
Rear Camera	2-megapixel	1.3-megapixel
RAM	512MB	-
Storage	32MB	-
Battery Capacity	1200mAh	1200mAh
OS	Android 4.2.2	Proprietary
Resolution	320x480 pixels	176x220 pixels
general
Brand	iBall	Micromax
Model	Andi 3.5 Classique	X265
Release date	March 1, 2014	November 1, 2010
Form factor	Touchscreen	Bar
Dimensions (mm)	115.90 x 62.60 x 11.10	113.70 x 50.00 x 14.70
Weight (g)	112.00	95.00
Battery capacity (mAh)	1200	1200
Removable battery	No	Yes
Colours	White, Black	Black
display
Screen size (inches)	3.50	2.20
Touchscreen	Yes	No
Resolution	320x480 pixels	176x220 pixels
Pixels per inch (PPI)	-	128
hardware
Processor	1.3GHz dual-core	one-core
Processor make	ARM Cortex-A7	-
RAM	512MB	-
Internal storage	32MB	-
Expandable storage	Yes	Yes
Expandable storage up to (GB)	32	2
Expandable storage type	-	microSD
camera
Rear camera	2-megapixel	1.3-megapixel
Rear flash	LED	No
Front camera	Unspecified	No
software
Operating system	Android 4.2.2	Proprietary
Skin	-	NA
connectivity
Wi-Fi	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standards supported	802.11 b/g/n	-
GPS	Yes	No
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Infrared	No	No
USB OTG	No	No
Headphones	3.5mm	3.5mm
FM	Yes	Yes
Number of SIMs	2	2
Wi-Fi Direct	No	No
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)	No	No
sim 1
GSM/CDMA	GSM	GSM
3G	No	No
4G/ LTE	No	No
SIM Type	-	Regular
sim 2
GSM/CDMA	GSM	GSM
3G	No	No
4G/ LTE	No	No
SIM Type	-	Regular
sensors
Compass/ Magnetometer	No	No
Proximity sensor	Yes	No
Accelerometer	Yes	No
Ambient light sensor	No	No
Gyroscope	Yes	No
Barometer	No	No
Temperature sensor	No	No

Popular Mobile Brands