KelpDAO Sues LayerZero Over $292 Million rsETH Exploit, Claims Bridge Risks Were Not Disclosed

KelpDAO alleges LayerZero approved the bridge configuration before the attack, while LayerZero disputes responsibility for the loss.

Advertisement
Written by Rahul Dhingra, Edited by Rohan Pal | Updated: 25 September 2026 17:51 IST
Highlights
  • KelpDAO says LayerZero approved the bridge configuration
  • Pellegrino said he will defend LayerZero in Vancouver
  • KelpDAO later planned to migrate rsETH to Chainlink oracles

KelpDAO planned to move rsETH to Chainlink following the cross-chain bridge incident

Photo Credit: Unsplash/Sasun Bughdaryan

KelpDAO has filed a lawsuit against LayerZero as well as its co-founder Bryan Pellegrino in British Columbia following the April 18 attack that resulted in the loss of 116,500 rsETH, amounting to roughly $292 million (roughly Rs. 2,797 crore). According to KelpDAO, which stated this on September 24, Evercrest Technologies Inc., the corporate body behind Kelp, brought forth the lawsuit. As per the claims, as highlighted on the official website of KelpDAO, LayerZero had failed to disclose any potential weaknesses and risks regarding the technologies that were being used and had allowed attackers to compromise their verification system.

LayerZero Attributes the Incident to a Single-Verifier Bridge Setup

Pellegrino is contesting the claim. In his response, Pellegrino stated that he considers the claims to be “meritless” and that he will defend himself and LayerZero in Vancouver. At present, reports indicate that the civil claim includes both Pellegrino and LayerZero individually. Part of the claim made by KelpDAO is based on the configuration of the bridge that was used for rsETH. According to the protocol, LayerZero had already approved the deployment and configuration of the bridge, contradicting LayerZero's later argument that Kelp created a dangerous single-verifier setup. 

Advertisement

LayerZero also came up with an alternative explanation. In a statement released by the company in April concerning the incident, LayerZero stated that Kelp employed a DVN configuration known as a 1-of-1 Decentralised Verifier Network. This means that there was no individual verifier that could refute a false message sent through the cross-chain network. LayerZero also argued that it had previously recommended verifier diversification and stated that the configuration was a single point of failure. 

There is a dispute over accountability between the two sides, but LayerZero's official report concludes that hackers were able to breach LayerZero Labs' infrastructure prior to the release of funds through the rsETH bridge. LayerZero made this detailed report public in May, stating that the attack started on March 6 when the attacker socially engineered a LayerZero developer and got his session credentials. This way, the attacker was able to breach LayerZero's RPC cloud network and tamper with the internal RPC nodes.

Advertisement

Following the attack in May, DeFi protocol Kelp DAO announced that it will be migrating its staking token, rsETH, to the Chainlink oracle platform. The protocol continues to place the blame for the attack on LayerZero's cross-chain infrastructure. LayerZero argued that the hack occurred because of an inadequate setup tied to Kelp's decentralised verifier network (DVN), which relied on a single LayerZero DVN as the only verified path, rather than requiring multiple checks of cross-chain transactions. LayerZero had advised against such a setup. 

Cryptocurrency is an unregulated digital currency, not a legal tender and subject to market risks. The information provided in the article is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice, trading advice or any other advice or recommendation of any sort offered or endorsed by NDTV. NDTV shall not be responsible for any loss arising from any investment based on any perceived recommendation, forecast or any other information contained in the article.

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Advertisement
Popular Mobile Brands
  1. Vivo V80 May Launch in India Early Next Month At This Price
  2. Google Photos Update Brings Redact Tool, Moods and AI Wardrobe
  3. HMD Vibe 2 Pro Confirmed to Launch in India Next Week; Specifications Teased
  4. OpenAI Could Launch a New Cybersecurity-Focused AI Model
  5. Flipkart Big Billion Days Sale: iPhone 17, Google Pixel 11 to Get Discounts
  6. Global Xiaomi 18 Pro and 18 Pro Max Said to Get Smaller Batteries
  7. Amazon Great Indian Festival 2026: These Smartphones Get Early Deals
  8. Here's How Much the Oppo K14 Plus 5G Will Cost in India
  1. Magic Eden Investigates Possible Exploit After NFTs Move for 0 ETH
  2. Amazon Great Indian Festival 2026: Early Deals Are Now Live on OnePlus N6x, iQOO Z10 Lite 5G, and More
  3. Marking 12 Years of Make in India, Gov't Targets the Brains Inside Our Smartphones
  4. Google Photos Update Brings Redact Tool, Moods and AI Wardrobe
  5. Halo Studios Reportedly Has Around 30 Employees Left After Layoffs as Activision Takes Charge of Franchise
  6. KelpDAO Sues LayerZero Over $292 Million rsETH Exploit, Claims Bridge Risks Were Not Disclosed
  7. OpenAI Plans to Launch a New Cybersecurity-Focused GPT-6 Series AI Model: Report
  8. Vivo V80 Price in India Leaked Ahead of October 6 Launch: What You Need to Know
  9. Infinix GT NX Controller With Pixel-Level FPS Touchpad, GT NX Station Cooling Dock Unveiled
  10. Bitget Suffers $351.6 Million Security Breach, Exchange Says No Private Keys Were Leaked
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.