Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE vs Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (2022) comparison
|
|
|
key specs |
Display | 10.90-inch | 12.60-inch |
Front Camera | 12-megapixel | 8-megapixel |
Resolution | 1440x2340 pixels | 2,560x1,600 pixels |
RAM | 8GB | 8GB |
OS | Android 15 | Android 12 |
Storage | 256GB | 256GB |
Rear Camera | 13-megapixel | 13-megapixel + 5-megapixel |
Battery Capacity | 8000mAh | 10,200mAh |
Processor | - | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 |
general |
Brand | Samsung | Lenovo |
Model | Galaxy Tab S10 FE | Tab P12 Pro (2022) |
Release date | April 2, 2025 | June 9, 2022 |
Launched in India | Yes | - |
Form factor | Touchscreen | Touchscreen |
Dimensions (mm) | 254.30 x 165.80 x 6.00 | 184.53 x 285.61 x 5.63 |
Weight (g) | 497.00 | 565.00 |
Battery capacity (mAh) | 8000 | 10,200 |
Colours | Grey, Light Blue, Silver | Storm Grey |
Removable battery | - | No |
display |
Screen size (inches) | 10.90 | 12.60 |
Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
Resolution | 1440x2340 pixels | 2,560x1,600 pixels |
hardware |
Processor make | Exynos 1580 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 |
RAM | 8GB | 8GB |
Internal storage | 256GB | 256GB |
Expandable storage | Yes | Yes |
Expandable storage type | microSD | microSD |
Expandable storage up to (GB) | 2000 | 1,000 |
Processor | - | 3.2GHz MHz octa-core |
camera |
Rear camera | 13-megapixel | 13-megapixel + 5-megapixel |
Front camera | 12-megapixel | 8-megapixel |
Rear flash | - | Yes |
software |
Operating system | Android 15 | Android 12 |
Skin | One UI 7 | - |
connectivity |
USB Type-C | Yes | - |
Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
GPS | Yes | - |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth version | 5.30 | - |
Number of SIMs | 2 | - |
sim 1 |
SIM Type | Nano-SIM | - |
sim 2 |
SIM Type | eSIM | - |
sensors |
Accelerometer | Yes | - |
Ambient light sensor | Yes | - |
Compass/ Magnetometer | Yes | - |
Fingerprint sensor | Yes | - |
Gyroscope | Yes | - |
ratings |
Overall NDTV Rating | - | Read Review |
Design Rating | - | |
Display Rating | - | |
Software Rating | - | |
Performance Rating | - | |
Battery Life Rating | - | |
Camera Rating | - | |
Value for Money Rating | - | |