Google Chrome to Offer Full Ad Blocking Features Only to Enterprise Users

Google proposed the Manifest V3 standard to limit ad blockers back in January.

Advertisement
By Jagmeet Singh | Updated: 30 May 2019 17:23 IST
Highlights
  • Google confirmed the change in response to developer complaints
  • It is bringing declarativeNetRequest API over the existing solution
  • The move would allegedly limit a large number of ad blockers

Google Chrome is currently using webRequest API to enable ad blocking

Google has responded to the issues raised by developer community pertaining to its move restricting ad blockers, and revealed that it would continue to enable complete ad blocking capabilities but only for paid, enterprise Chrome users. The new change comes months after the search giant faced outrage for proposing the Manifest V3 standard, which is aimed to replace the existing webRequest API with declarativeNetRequest API. The new API would limit the ways in which ad blocking extensions can be used to filter Web traffic. Notably, the proposed change was announced back in January and since then, a large number of extension developers are protesting the move.

"Chrome is depreciating the blocking capabilities of the webRequest API in Manifest V3, not the entire webRequest API (though blocking will still be available to enterprise deployments)," Google clarified while responding to the feedback it has received on the proposed changes.

Advertisement

The response explicitly shows that Google is not moving entirely to the proposed alternative. However, it does highlight that the company is set to retain the existing webRequest API only for enterprise users -- specifically the ones who'll pay to use Chrome.

In other words, for all the developers who aren't targeting enterprise users, Google won't make any major changes and will still stick to the Manifest V3 that it announced in January.

Advertisement

As many extension developers earlier noted in their complaints, the arrival of declarativeNetRequest API would make ad blockers less effective. "Extensions act on behalf of users, they add capabilities to a user agent, and deprecating the block ability of the webRequest API will essentially decrease the level of user agency in Chromium, to the benefit of websites which obviously would be happy to have the last word in what resources their pages can fetch/execute/render," uBlock Origin and uMatrix extensions maker Raymond Hill had alleged while protesting against the new change.

One of the prime concerns of developers for complaining against the declarativeNetRequest API is the limit of 30,000 rules and cannot allow for rules such as blocking content elements beyond a certain size. Google has mentioned in its latest response that it is set to increase the original limit.

Advertisement

"We are planning to raise these values but we won't have updated numbers until we can run performance tests to find a good upper bound that will work across all supported devices," the company said.

By limiting ad-blockers through its new development, Google was alleged to protect its ad-driven business model. A recent SEC Form 10-K filing by Google parent Alphabet does acknowledge the loss, as noticed by 9to5Google. The company underlines ad blocking extensions as a "risk factor" to Google's revenues.

Advertisement

That being said, Google won't be able to implement the changes it planned under the Manifest V3 document anytime soon. It would take some time to convince extension developers and continue to make Chrome and the entire Chromium project friendly enough for developers.

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Further reading: Google Chrome, Chrome, Google
Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. Oppo K15 With Dual 50-Megapixel Rear Cameras Arrives at This Price
  2. Apple to Become Third-Largest Foldable Phone Maker Within Months of Launch
  3. This Snapdragon Chipset Could Power the Oppo A7 Pro Max
  4. Xiaomi Power Bank 5i 20000 67W With Built-In USB Type-C Cable Launched in India
  5. Here's When the OnePlus N6x Will Launch in India: See Expected Specs
  6. Poco F9 Ultra, Poco F9 Pro Spotted on Multiple Certification Sites Ahead of Launch
  7. Apple Rolls Out iOS 27 Public Beta 2 Update for Eligible iPhone Models
  8. iQOO 15 Ultra Appears on EEC Listing Ahead of Global Launch
  9. Here's How the Oppo Find X10 Series Could Look
  10. iPhone 18 Pro Max Price Leak Hints at Apple's Costliest Non-Folding iPhone
  1. Oppo A7 Pro Max Chipset, Performance Details Appear in Geekbench Listing: Expected Specifications
  2. iPhone 18 Pro Max Could Be Apple's Most Expensive Non-Folding iPhone Yet, Leak Suggests
  3. iQOO 15 Ultra Global Variant Reportedly Spotted on EEC Certification Site
  4. Oppo K15 Launched With 8,000mAh Battery, Dual 50-Megapixel Rear Cameras: Price, Specifications
  5. iPhone Ultra to Challenge Samsung, Huawei With 25 Percent Market Share Within Months of Launch: Report
  6. Qualcomm Reportedly Developing Fourth Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Variant for More Affordable Flagship Phones
  7. Apple Rolls Out iOS 27 Public Beta 2 Update for Eligible iPhone Models: See What’s New
  8. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 9 Ultra May Match Galaxy S27 Ultra With 200-Megapixel Camera, 5x Periscope Zoom
  9. Google Introduces Selfie Video Sign-In for Account Recovery
  10. Boat Nirvana Eutopia 2 ANC Launched in India With 45dB Hybrid ANC, Up to 80 Hours of Battery Life: Price, Features
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.