Google's Fight Against EU Antitrust Fine Comes Up Against Critical Judge

Judges are expected to issue their ruling in the Google antitrust case next year, which can be appealed to the Court of Justice, Europe's highest.

Advertisement
By Reuters | Updated: 14 February 2020 12:55 IST
Highlights
  • Google's battle against a fine was dealt an apparent setback
  • Google unfairly favoured its own shopping service: European Commission
  • Judges are expected to issue their ruling next year

Mac Eochaidh repeatedly asked Google what it had refused to supply to its competitors

Google's battle against a $2.6 billion EU antitrust fine was dealt an apparent setback on Thursday, when one of the judges hearing the case said the company had committed a "clear infraction" in its handling of price-comparison shopping services.

The comments by Colm Mac Eochaidh, one of the panel of five judges, came on day two of a three-day hearing at Europe's General Court - its second highest - as Google seeks to overturn the first of a trio of EU antitrust penalties.

Advertisement

In its 2017 decision to impose a EUR 2.4-billion ($2.6 billion) fine, the European Commission said the world's biggest Internet search engine unfairly favoured its own price-comparison shopping service over smaller European rivals.

Irish judge Mac Eochaidh concurred.

"For me, this case really is visibility. This is a very important point in the case. It is perfectly apparent what has happened is this: you have promoted your own service and demoted that of others," he said. "That is a clear infraction."

Advertisement

Mac Eochaidh repeatedly asked Google what it had refused to supply to its competitors that had forced them to air their grievances to EU enforcers.

Google's lawyer Christopher Thomas faulted the Commission for not taking Amazon into account when defining the market for assessing the competitive harm caused by Google's practices.

Advertisement

Regulators were right to discount Amazon's role, said Thomas Hoppner, lawyer for several German complainants.

"Merchant platforms and CSSs (comparison shopping services) simply cater to different needs of different types of online retailers. These different needs mean that CSSs cannot easily be transformed into merchant platforms and vice versa," he said.

Advertisement

"The entire Google story that the condemned conduct was a means to compete with Amazon has no merits."

Judges are expected to issue their ruling next year, which can be appealed to the Court of Justice, Europe's highest.

The case is T-612/17 Google and Alphabet v Commission.

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Further reading: Google, EU
Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. Here's How the Samsung Galaxy S27 Could Look: See Expected Features
  1. Samsung Galaxy XCover 8, XCover FR/Scan Camera Specifications Reportedly Leaked
  2. WhatsApp View Once Text Messages Reportedly Rolling Out to Android Beta Testers
  3. Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ Price in India Reportedly Hiked by Rs. 3,000
  4. Microsoft Bing’s New Extension Brings Back Traditional Search, Lets Users Turn Off AI Answers
  5. Samsung Galaxy S27 Ultra, Galaxy S27 Pro and Galaxy S27+ Leaked Dummy Unit Images Suggest Significant Design Overhaul
  6. Realme to Expand Its After-Sales Service Network to Over 670 Centres in India With Oppo’s Existing Infrastructure
  7. Oppo Reno 17 Series Chipsets, Key Features Confirmed Ahead of November 16 Launch
  8. Vivo X500s Tipped to Pack 64-Megapixel Periscope Camera, Dimensity 9-Series Chip
  9. Xiaomi Watch S5 41mm, Xiaomi Clip and Mijia Smart Home Appliances to Launch Next Week Alongside Xiaomi 18 Pro Series
  10. ChatGPT Finances Now Available on Mac, Lets Users Track Spending, Savings and More
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.