US court revives Viacom's $1 billion lawsuit against Youtube

Advertisement
By Reuters | Updated: 5 June 2012 16:14 IST
Highlights
  • A federal appeals court has revived a $1 billion lawsuit by Viacom against YouTube over alleged unauthorized posting of Viacom content.
A U.S. appeals court has revived lawsuits by Viacom Inc, the English Premier League, and various film studios and television networks accusing Google Inc of allowing copyrighted videos on its YouTube service without permission.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said on Thursday that a reasonable jury could have found that YouTube knew of specific infringing activity on its website. As a result, it said a lower court made a mistake in dismissing the case.

Viacom had no immediate comment. Google and both the companies' lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Advertisement

The original $1 billion lawsuit filed by Viacom in 2007 went to the heart of a major issue facing media companies, specifically how to win Internet viewers without ceding control of TV shows, movies and music.

It was seen as a test of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, a 1998 federal law making it illegal to produce technology to circumvent anti-piracy measures, and limiting liability of online service providers for copyright infringement by users.

Advertisement

The plaintiffs in the cases before the 2nd Circuit collectively accused YouTube of improperly broadcasting about 79,000 copyrighted videos on its website between 2005 and 2008.

Viacom had contended that Google and YouTube did nothing to stop the infringements relating to such programming as "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart," "South Park" and "SpongeBob SquarePants."

Advertisement

The 2nd Circuit found that while Google and YouTube were entitled to a "safe harbor" provision of the copyright law, it was an open question as to whether they had "actual knowledge or 'red flag' awareness" of specific instances of infringement.

It also said the lower court should consider whether YouTube demonstrated "willful blindness" in allowing copyrighted videos to remain on its website.

Advertisement

The cases are Viacom International Inc et al v. YouTube Inc et al; 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 10-3270; and The Football Association Premier League Ltd et al v. YouTube Inc in the same court, No. 10-3342.

Copyright Thomson Reuters 2012

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Further reading: google, viacom, youtube
Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. Vivo T5x 5G Roundup: Here's Everything That We Know So Far
  2. Border 2 OTT Release Details: Sunny Deol Returns in Triple-Front War Saga
  1. Funky Available for Streaming Online: Where to Watch Vishwak Sen’s New Comedy Directed by Anudeep KV?
  2. Border 2 OTT Release Date: When and Where to Watch Sunny Deol and Varun Dhawan Starrer Online?
  3. Nvidia GTC 2026: How to Watch Jensen Huang’s Nvidia keynote and What to Expect
  4. Scientists Trace Rare Cosmic Outburst to a Massive Planetary Collision Around Gaia20ehk
  5. That Night Streaming on Netflix: What to Know About Clara Galle and Claudia Salas Starrer
  6. Jazz City OTT Release Date: When and Where to Watch Arifin Shuvoo and Sauraseni Maitra Starrer Online?
  7. Kirtaner Por Kirtan OTT Release: Where to Watch the Sequel to the 2023 Bengali Hit Comedy Online?
  8. Phantom Lawyer Season 1 Streaming on Netflix: What to Know About Yoo Yeon-seok and Esom Starrer
  9. Pizza Movie OTT Release Date: When and Where to Watch Gaten Matarazzo and Sean Giambrone Starrer Online?
  10. Hubble and Euclid Reveal Stunning New View of Cat’s Eye Nebula
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.