Amazon.com Escapes Trademark Suit After Appeals Court Reverses Itself

Advertisement
By Reuters | Updated: 22 October 2015 13:31 IST
Amazon.com Inc did not violate the trademarks of a high-end watchmaker by offering alternative brands with similar styles in its search results, a federal appeals court ruled on Wednesday.

In a rare move, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco reversed its own opinion from July and said that a lower court correctly found in Amazon.com's favor because the search results would not likely confuse customers.

Multi Time Machine Inc makes the MTM Special Ops military-style wristwatch, which is not sold on Amazon's website, according to the ruling.

If an Amazon shopper searches for it, however, the site does not say it does not carry MTM products. Instead, Amazon displays MTM Special Ops in the search field and immediately below the search field, but lists only similar watches manufactured by MTM's competitors for sale.

Los Angeles-based MTM alleged this could cause customers to buy a competitor's watch, rather than encouraging them to look for MTM watches elsewhere.

Advertisement

MTM sued in 2011, and a federal judge in Los Angeles resolved the trademark claims in favor of Amazon.com before trial. In July, the 9th Circuit ruled that MTM's lawsuit should be allowed to proceed.

But after Amazon.com asked for a rehearing, the panel withdrew the previous decision and on Wednesday said MTM's case fails.

Advertisement

"Because Amazon's search results page clearly labels the name and manufacturer of each product offered for sale and even includes photographs of the items, no reasonably prudent consumer accustomed to shopping online would likely be confused as to the source of the products," the panel majority said in a 2-1 opinion.

Representatives for Amazon.com and MTM could not immediately be reached.

Advertisement

Circuit Judge Carlos Bea, however, dissented, saying that he believed an Amazon.com shopper looking for an MTM watch might initially think the watches on offer are affiliated with MTM.

The case in the 9th Circuit is Multi Time Machine Inc vs. Amazon.com Inc and Amazon Services LLC, 13-55575.

© Thomson Reuters 2015

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Further reading: Amazon, Internet
Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. Redmi Note 17 Series is All Set to Launch Globally on This Date
  2. Jio Prime Membership Re-Launched in India With These Benefits
  3. Google Pixel 11 Ads Spark Speculation Over New Fitbit Tracker
  4. Poco, Oppo Raise Prices of These Smartphones in India: See New Prices
  5. Is the 'Ultra' Era Ending? Xiaomi 18 Ultra Reportedly Scrapped
  1. Claude Text Watermark Explained: How Anthropic Will Detect AI Content
  2. Samsung Galaxy S26 FE Leaked Hands-on Video Showcases Design
  3. Epic Games Store Confirmed to Get Official Linux Support Soon
  4. Israel’s Bits of Gold Suffers Data Breach Affecting 200,000 Customers
  5. BitMart Users Demand Answers Over Withdrawal Issues, Unpaid Salaries Ahead of August 19 Deadline
  6. Google Pixel 11 Ads Reportedly Reveal Mysterious Fitbit-Like Fitness Tracker
  7. Boltt Ace 5G, Evo 4G Battery, Display Details Teased Just Days Ahead of Launch
  8. Jio Prime Membership Relaunched in India: Tariff Certainty, Cashback Vouchers, and More Benefits
  9. Samsung Plans to Launch Five Foldable Phones Next Year, Including Galaxy Z TriFold 2, Galaxy Fold 9 Series: Report
  10. OnePlus 16 Could Offer Major Display Upgrade With BOE X4 Material and Slim Bezels
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.