Apple and Broadcom have argued that they should have been allowed to raise the patent challenges during the trial.
Apple is a major purchaser of Broadcom chips
The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a bid by Apple and Broadcom to revive their challenges to Caltech data-transmission patents in a patent infringement case in which the university's earlier $1.1 billion (nearly Rs. 9,000 crore) jury verdict against the companies was thrown out.
The justices turned away an appeal by Apple and Broadcom of a lower court's ruling affirming a trial judge's decision to prevent the companies from contesting the validity of the patents as they defended against the California Institute of Technology's lawsuit.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which specializes in patent cases, ruled against the companies' arguments because they failed to bring them up during earlier proceedings at the US Patent and Trademark Office.
Apple and Broadcom have argued that they should have been allowed to raise the patent challenges during the trial.
A jury found that the companies infringed Caltech's patents, ordering Apple to pay $837.8 million (nearly Rs. 6.900 crore) and Broadcom to pay $270.2 million (nearly Rs. 2,200 crore). The Federal Circuit took issue with the amount of the award, and sent the case back for a new trial on damages.
Caltech, located in Pasadena, California, sued Cupertino-based Apple and San Jose-based Broadcom in 2016 in federal court in Los Angeles, alleging that millions of iPhones, iPads, Apple Watches and other devices using Broadcom Wi-Fi chips infringed its data-transmission patents.
Apple is a major purchaser of Broadcom chips, and in January 2020 reached a supply agreement that ends in 2023. Broadcom has estimated that 20 percent of its revenue comes from Apple.
The Federal Circuit also upheld the trial judge's decision to block the companies from arguing that the patents were invalid because they could have made the arguments in their petitions for USPTO review of the patents.
Apple and Broadcom told the Supreme Court that the Federal Circuit misread the law, which they said only blocks arguments that could have been raised during the review itself.
President Joe Biden's administration urged the justices in May to reject the case and argued that the Federal Circuit had interpreted the law correctly.
Caltech has also sued Microsoft, Samsung Electronics, Dell Technologies and HP, accusing them of infringing the same patents in separate cases that are still pending.
© Thomson Reuters 2023
Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.