Apple Case Against Samsung Should Go Back to Lower Court: US DoJ

Advertisement
By Reuters | Updated: 9 June 2016 10:16 IST
Highlights
  • US DoJ asked Supreme Court to overturn ruling that favoured Apple.
  • Apple and Samsung have been feuding over patents since 2011.
  • Apple spokeswoman declined to comment.
The US Department of Justice asked the Supreme Court to overturn an appeals court ruling that had favoured Apple Inc over Samsung Electronics Co Ltd in smartphone patent litigation, and asked that it return the case to the trial court for more litigation.

Samsung had appealed a federal appeals court ruling to the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case. The Justice Department submitted its view in an amicus brief on Wednesday.

An Apple spokeswoman declined to comment, and Samsung representatives could not immediately be reached.

The world's top smartphone rivals have been feuding over patents since 2011, when Apple sued Samsung in Northern California alleging infringement of the iPhone's patents, designs and trademarked appearance.

Advertisement

Following a 2012 jury trial, Samsung was ordered to pay Apple $930 million (roughly Rs. 6,190 crores). Samsung has been trying to reduce that figure ever since.

Advertisement

Its efforts were partially rewarded in May 2015, when the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the trademark liability, bringing Samsung's exposure down to $548 million.

The appeals court, however, upheld Samsung's infringement of the iPhone's patents, including those related to the designs of the iPhone's rounded-corner front face, bezel and colourful grid of icons.

Advertisement

(Also see:  Samsung Wins US Appeal in Apple Patent Case)

Samsung then asked the Supreme Court to review the design patent portion of the decision, calling the damages awarded excessive. In March, the justices agreed to look into whether courts should award in damages the total profits from a product that infringes a design patent, if the patent applies only to a component of the product.

Advertisement

In its amicus brief on Wednesday, the Justice Department said it was unclear whether Samsung had produced enough evidence to support its argument that phone components, not the entire phone, should be what matters when calculating damages.

The Supreme Court should send the case back for the trial court to determine whether a new trial is warranted on that issue, the Justice Department said.

The case is Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al vs. Apple Inc, in the Supreme Court of the United States, No. 15-777.

© Thomson Reuters 2016

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. Xiaomi Pad 8 Launches Globally Alongside Xiaomi Tag: Price, Features
  1. Xiaomi Pad 8 Launched Globally With 11.2-inch LCD Screen, Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 Chip: Price, Specifications
  2. Xiaomi 17 Ultra Launched Globally With 200-Megapixel Persicope Camera Alongside Xiaomi 17: Price, Specifications
  3. NASA’s ESCAPADE Mission to Study Space Weather Between Earth and Mars
  4. Huawei Watch GT Runner 2 Launched Globally With Intelligent Marathon Mode, 3D Floating Antenna: Price, Features
  5. Honor Magic V6 With Nearly Creaseless Inner Display Teased By Product Manager Ahead of MWC
  6. Sony Said to Be 'Backing Away' From Launching Its Single-Player Games on PC
  7. Android 17 Beta 2 Released: Lets Users Create Bubble for Any App, Expands SMS OTP Protection
  8. Ultrahuman Ring Pro Launched With 15-Day Battery Life, Jade Biointelligence AI: Price, Features
  9. Monarch: Legacy of Monsters Season 2 Now Streaming on Apple TV+: Everything You Need to Know
  10. Vladimir OTT Release Date: When and Where to Watch Rachel Weisz Starrer Thriller Online?
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.