Supreme Court Dismisses Criminal Case Against Samsung Electronics

Advertisement
By Indo-Asian News Service | Updated: 6 August 2015 13:16 IST
The Supreme Court on Wednesday quashed a criminal case registered against Samsung India Electronics on a complaint by one Ashok Chaurdia, alleging cheating and criminal conspiracy by marketing a 29-inch television set with an actual viewer screen of 27.2 inches.

Quashing the case on the company's plea, an apex court bench of Justice Madan B. Lokur and Justice R.K. Agrawal said Samsung should tell the customers the actual size of the screen they (customers) would get to view.

The court said its order that a buyer of the television set should be told about the actual size of the viewer screen held good for other electronic companies marketing television sets.

Advertisement

The court order came after counsel for Samsung told the court that what they had said in their brochures was done by other companies as well and was a market practice.

In the instant case, Ashok Chaurdia of Ratlam in Madhya Pradesh bought a Samsung TV after being told it had a screen of 29 inches. However, upon measuring, he found it to be 27.2 inches 1.8 inches shorter than what he was told at the time of purchase.

Advertisement

After representation to Samsung, Ashok Chaurdia filed a complaint and the trial court issued bailable warrants against Samsung India Electronic and its executives.

Samsung denied the allegations, contending that the screen size mentioned was in fact the size of the picture tube and not the viewing area. They backed up their point by referring to the prevalent market practices and the Consumer Electronics and Appliances Manufacturing Association certificates.

Advertisement

The electronic giant moved the Madhya Pradesh High Court challenging the criminal case but the court declined to quash the case, saying that nowhere did the company said that a part of the 29-inch picture tube would be covered by the bezel or frame.

On an appeal challenging the 2008 high court order, the apex court by its December 19, 2008 order stayed the proceedings before the trial court.

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. Asus ExpertBook Ultra Debuts in India Alongside New ExpertBook Models
  2. How Instagram's Edits App Evolved Over the Past Year and What's Next
  3. OpenAI's ChatGPT Images 2.0 Brings Better Accuracy, Multilingual Text Support
  4. Motorola Edge 70 Pro vs OnePlus Nord 6 vs Redmi Note 15 Pro+ Compared
  5. Qualcomm May Return to Samsung for New Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Chips 
  1. NASA’s Curiosity Rover Finds Crater Filled With Sand, Alters Drilling Plans
  2. Control Ultimate Edition Arrives on iPhone and iPad With Touch Controls, Universal Purchase
  3. Asus ExpertBook Ultra With Intel Core Ultra X7 Series 3 CPU Launched in India Alongside ExpertBook P3, ExpertBook P5 Series
  4. Boat Aavante Prime X Soundbar Launched in India With Dolby Atmos, Wireless Satellite Speakers: Price, Features
  5. Qualcomm CEO Reportedly Visits Samsung Foundry in Korea to Discuss Producing 2nm Chips
  6. Coinbase Announces USDC-INR Trading Services for Users in India
  7. Redmi K Pad 2 Launched With 8.8-Inch 3K Display, Dimensity 9500 Chip: Price, Specifications
  8. Suyodhana OTT Release Date: When and Where to Watch This Telugu Mystry Thriller Online?
  9. OnePlus Watch 4 Launch Appears Imminent as Listing Confirms Snapdragon W5 Chip, OxygenOS Watch 8
  10. Sennheiser CX 80U, Sennheiser HD 400U With USB Type-C Connectivity Launched in India: Price, Features
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.