Intex Aqua N15

Name: Intex Aqua N15
Brand: Intex
SKU: SKU1719
Rating: 3.3 (13 reviews)

Intex
13 User Ratings
Last Updated: 10th October 2026

Overview
Specs
Comparisons
User Reviews
News

₹6,455 Notify When Available

Compare Notify When Available

Key Specs

Display 4.00-inch (480x854)
Processor 1.3GHz quad-core
Front Camera 2MP
Rear Camera 8MP
RAM 1GB
Storage 4GB
OS Android 4.4

Market Status Released

Release Date June 2014

Intex Aqua N15 Summary

Intex Aqua N15 mobile was launched in June 2014. The phone comes with a 4.00-inch touchscreen display offering a resolution of 480x854 pixels. Intex Aqua N15 is powered by a 1.3GHz quad-core processor. It comes with 1GB of RAM.

As far as the cameras are concerned, the Intex Aqua N15 on the rear packs 8-megapixel camera. It sports a 2-megapixel camera on the front for selfies.

Intex Aqua N15 is based on Android 4.4 and packs 4GB of inbuilt storage that can be expanded via microSD card (up to 32GB). The Intex Aqua N15 is a dual-SIM (GSM and GSM) mobile that accepts Regular and Regular cards.

Connectivity options on the Intex Aqua N15 include Wi-Fi, GPS, FM radio, and 3G. Sensors on the phone include accelerometer and proximity sensor.

As of 10th October 2026, Intex Aqua N15 price in India starts at Rs. 6,455.

Intex Aqua N15 Full Specifications

General

Brand	Intex
Model	Aqua N15
Price in India	₹6,455
Release date	June 2014
Removable battery	Yes

Display

Screen size (inches)	4.00
Touchscreen	Yes
Resolution	480x854 pixels

Hardware

Processor	1.3GHz quad-core
RAM	1GB
Internal storage	4GB
Expandable storage	Yes
Expandable storage type	microSD
Expandable storage up to (GB)	32

Camera

Rear camera	8-megapixel
Rear flash	LED
Front camera	2-megapixel

Software

Operating system

Android 4.4

Connectivity

Wi-Fi	Yes
GPS	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	No
Infrared	No
USB OTG	No
Headphones	3.5mm
FM	Yes
Number of SIMs	2
Wi-Fi Direct	No
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)	No
SIM 1
SIM Type	Regular
GSM/CDMA	GSM
3G	Yes
4G/ LTE	No
Supports 4G in India (Band 40)	No
SIM 2
SIM Type	Regular
GSM/CDMA	GSM
3G	Yes
4G/ LTE	No
Supports 4G in India (Band 40)	No

Sensors

Compass/ Magnetometer	No
Proximity sensor	Yes
Accelerometer	Yes
Ambient light sensor	No
Gyroscope	No
Barometer	No
Temperature sensor	No

! Error or missing information? Please let us know

Intex Aqua N15 Competitors

Tecno Spark Go (2023)

Compare

Compare

Compare

Compare

Compare

Compare

Compare

Compare

Compare Intex Aqua N15 With »

Intex Aqua N15 User Review and Ratings

3.3★ 13 ratings &
13 reviews

5 ★

3
4 ★

3
3 ★

4
2 ★

1
1 ★

2

Write Your Review

Displaying 1-5 of 13 reviews

Sort By:

very good phone for 4.5k

HARSHITH MAHAL_ (Jul 31, 2016) on Gadgets 360 Recommends

Despite camera and non compatibility of usbotg eeverything is good

Is this review helpful?
Reply
fEATURES AMAZIONG , CAMERA iS NOT GOOD NOT bAD.

Vikram Kweera (Sep 6, 2014) on Gadgets 360

set acha hai features bhi amaZing , 6000 hajaar mai vo cheej mil jaate jiske liye samsung , nokia mai 12000 bhi kam pad jaaye saayad . Camera teek hai , Ek baat ye bhi agaar 6000 hajaar mai camera acha mil jaayegato tho koi digital kyo karedega . Baas itna hi hai faMOUS BRAND NAHI HAI , SAMSUNG KI TARAHE LOGO KO BATANE KE ;LIYE bAS NEED TO BE IMPROVE SERVICE CENTRE SERVICE.

Is this review helpful?
Reply
Best Budget Phone but yet to check physically

Srinivas Ch (Aug 17, 2014) on Gadgets 360

Based on the Specification, It is too good in this budget and I have ordered one handset through snapdeal and yet to receive. Better to increase service centers in main cities to succeed in competitive market.

Is this review helpful?
Reply
good phone with less money

Faiz Kazi (Aug 14, 2014) on Gadgets 360

Samsung has gone same like nokia only small changes in different model unnecessary extra money without much software so intex has given kit kat and 1 gb ram so very good phone with lots of gesture n best camera both good battery

Is this review helpful?
(1) Reply
Terrific

Flipkart Customer (Sep 25, 2019) on Flipkart

One of the most durable electronic

Is this review helpful?
Reply