Facebook Death Threat Not Grounds for Conviction: US Supreme Court

Advertisement
By Agence France-Presse | Updated: 2 June 2015 11:30 IST
The US Supreme Court ruled Monday that a death threat posted on Facebook was not enough to convict its author unless there was explicit intent to cause harm.

But the court took pains to make its ruling on statutory grounds rather than address the broader issue of whether such a statement is protected under First Amendment guarantees of free speech.

The nine-member court first heard arguments in the case December 1, 2014. The panel had to rule on apparent death threats that a man upset over his separation from his wife made against her on Facebook. His comments landed him in prison.

Advertisement

Elonis was convicted of violating a federal law that makes it a crime to transmit in interstate commerce "any communication containing any threat . . . to injure the person of another."

"There's one way to love you but a thousand ways to kill you. I'm not going to rest until your body is a mess, soaked in blood and dying from all the little cuts," Anthony Elonis' post said in the form of rap music lyrics.

Advertisement

The court had to decide if the threat posted on Facebook actually bore with it an intention to cause harm or was rather a form of expression covered by the First Amendment.

In a 7-2 decision, the judges said it was "unnecessary to consider any 1st Amendment issues."

Advertisement

It said "requiring only negligence with respect to the communication of a threat is not sufficient to support a conviction."

Elonis has said that his post was simply a "therapeutic" tool and that he had no intention to hurt anyone, so his message did not amount to an actual threat.

Advertisement

Still, a lower court sentenced him to three years in jail and three years' probation.

But the Supreme Court sided Monday with Elonis. It threw out his conviction and sent the case back to the lower court.

The high court said prosecutors should have had to prove that Elonis actually had a specific intent to cause harm to his estranged wife.

When the case first came before the court late last year, the government had argued that the federal law under which Elonis was jailed barred actual threats defined as statements a "reasonable person" would construe as the serious expression of an intent to cause harm.

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Further reading: Facebook, Social
Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. Motorola Edge 70 Pro Arrives With a 6,500mAh Battery at This Price in India
  2. Elden Ring Movie Film Adaptation Release Date, Full Cast Revealed
  1. NASA’s Curiosity Rover Finds Crater Filled With Sand, Alters Drilling Plans
  2. Control Ultimate Edition Arrives on iPhone and iPad With Touch Controls, Universal Purchase
  3. Asus ExpertBook Ultra With Intel Core Ultra X7 Series 3 CPU Launched in India Alongside ExpertBook P3, ExpertBook P5 Series
  4. Boat Aavante Prime X Soundbar Launched in India With Dolby Atmos, Wireless Satellite Speakers: Price, Features
  5. Qualcomm CEO Reportedly Visits Samsung Foundry in Korea to Discuss Producing 2nm Chips
  6. Coinbase Announces USDC-INR Trading Services for Users in India
  7. Redmi K Pad 2 Launched With 8.8-Inch 3K Display, Dimensity 9500 Chip: Price, Specifications
  8. Suyodhana OTT Release Date: When and Where to Watch This Telugu Mystry Thriller Online?
  9. OnePlus Watch 4 Launch Appears Imminent as Listing Confirms Snapdragon W5 Chip, OxygenOS Watch 8
  10. Sennheiser CX 80U, Sennheiser HD 400U With USB Type-C Connectivity Launched in India: Price, Features
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.