Man who sued Mark Zuckerberg must face fraud charges, says US judge

Advertisement
By Reuters | Updated: 8 March 2014 12:51 IST
A New York businessman must face criminal fraud charges for trying to claim a billion-dollar stake in social media company Facebook Inc, a federal judge ruled on Friday.

Paul Ceglia, 40, is accused of forging a 2003 contract with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg that supposedly entitled him to part ownership of the company.

After an hour-long hearing in New York, U.S. District Judge Andrew Carter rejected Ceglia's request to throw out the charges, finding he had failed to meet the "high standard" needed to dismiss a grand jury indictment.

Advertisement

Ceglia sued Zuckerberg and Facebook in 2010 in a federal court in Buffalo, New York, claiming that he and Zuckerberg had signed a contract while Zuckerberg was a freshman at Harvard University for Ceglia to invest $1,000 in a planned social networking website.

Zuckerberg had previously done some programming work for Ceglia's company, StreetFax.com. Facebook has argued that the only contract between the two men was related to that company and accused Ceglia of faking various documents as part of his lawsuit.

Advertisement

Last year, a magistrate judge in Buffalo recommended that Ceglia's lawsuit be dismissed, finding that it was "highly probable and reasonably certain" that the contract was fabricated in order to pursue the lawsuit. The federal judge overseeing the case has not yet ruled on that recommendation.

Prosecutors in New York charged Ceglia in 2012, accusing him of forging documents as part of the Buffalo litigation.

Advertisement

Ceglia has since filed a separate lawsuit against Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, whose office is prosecuting Ceglia, and U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder seeking to halt the criminal case.

On Friday, Ceglia's defense attorney, David Patton, argued that the government should be barred from prosecuting him for allegations he made in the context of a civil lawsuit, warning that it could discourage litigants from filing claims.

Advertisement

He also said the government's allegations do not constitute criminal fraud under federal law.

"They're alleging that it's simply a phony, sham litigation," he said. "That's not fraud."

Carter said the indictment was sufficient to move ahead, though he said he would consider Patton's arguments at a later date if the case goes to trial.

Following the hearing, Ceglia vowed to press forward with his claims against Facebook, while his civil attorney, Joseph Alioto, said they would prove the Zuckerberg contract is legitimate.

"Nothing is going to stop me," Ceglia said.

Ceglia's lawsuit created a bizarre backdrop as Facebook marched toward its initial public offering in May 2013. Facebook's origins were also the subject of a separate legal challenge by Zuckerberg's Harvard classmates, twins Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, that was chronicled in the 2010 film, "The Social Network."

The criminal case is U.S. v. Ceglia, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No 12-cr-00876. The lawsuit against Bharara and Holder is Ceglia v. Holder et al in the same court, No. 13-00256. The civil case is Ceglia v. Zuckerberg et al, U.S. District Court, Western District of New York, No. 10-00569.

© Thomson Reuters 2014

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. JioTag 2 Launched in India With Google Find Hub and Apple Find My Support
  2. iQOO Z11 to Debut in India With a Different Design Than the Chinese Model
  3. Poco M8 Power Will Launch in India With This Rear Camera Setup
  4. Sony Launches 115-inch BRAVIA 9 II True RGB TV in India
  5. OnePlus Independence Day Sale Brings Offers on OnePlus 15, Nord Series, More
  6. Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G Debuts in India With These Features
  7. Oppo A7 Pro Max Rear Camera Features Revealed
  8. Vivo S2 Key Specifications Teased Ahead of August 6 India Launch
  9. Google Pixel 11 Series Could Start at $899; Specifications Surface Online
  10. Oppo Find X10 Ultra Could Match Find N6 Price, Upgraded Cameras
  1. Boltt Smartphone India Launch Date Announced; Flipkart Microsite Goes Live
  2. OnePlus Independence Day Sale 2026 Announced: Discounts on OnePlus 15, OnePlus 15R, Nord CE 6, More
  3. Oppo F35 Series India Launch Tipped for Early September; Find X9s Pro Could Follow
  4. Binance Announces Delisting of Six Tokens, Sets August 7 Futures Deadline
  5. Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC Launched in India With Up to 60 Hours of Battery Life
  6. Dragon's Dogma 2 Is Getting a 60 FPS Update on Consoles and a Hard Mode Ahead of Dark Arisen Expansion
  7. ZeroStack Faces Survival Challenge After Posting $82.5 Million Loss
  8. Sony Bravia 9 II 115-inch True RGB TV Launched in India With Backlight Master Drive Pro Tech: Price, Specifications
  9. iQOO Neo 11S Leak Hints at Bigger Battery, Custom Dimensity 9500 SoC
  10. Oppo Find X10 Ultra Leak Hints at 200-Megapixel Camera Upgrade, Premium Price Tag
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.