Instagram asks court to throw out lawsuit over service terms

Advertisement
By Reuters | Updated: 14 February 2013 18:52 IST
Facebook's Instagram photo sharing service asked a federal court on Wednesday to throw out a lawsuit filed against the popular app over changes to its terms of service.

The proposed class action lawsuit was filed in San Francisco in December by an Instagram user who leveled breach of contract and other claims against the service.

Instagram last year rolled out and then amended policy changes that incensed users who feared the photo-sharing service would use their pictures without compensation.

Advertisement

In Wednesday's filing, Instagram argues that the plaintiff, Lucy Funes, has no right to bring her claim because she could have deleted her Instagram account before the changes in the term of service went into effect.

The changes in the terms of service were first announced on December 17 and then altered a few days later following widespread user complaints.

Funes sued the company on December 21, nearly a month before the changes in the terms of service went into effect on January 19, the court papers said.

She continued to use her account after that day, according to Instagram's filing.

Instagram also disputed Funes' claims that the new terms required her to transfer rights in her photos to the company.

Advertisement

Both the old service terms and the new ones "emphasize that owns the content she posts through Instagram's service," the filing said.

An attorney for the plaintiff was not immediately available for comment. Facebook declined to comment.

Advertisement

In announcing the revised terms of service in December, Instagram also announced a mandatory arbitration clause, forcing users to waive their rights to participate in a class action lawsuit except under very limited circumstances.

Following user backlash, Instagram founder and CEO Kevin Systrom retreated partially, deleting language about displaying photos without compensation.

Advertisement

However, Instagram kept language that gave it the ability to place ads in conjunction with user content, saying "that we may not always identify paid services, sponsored content, or commercial communications as such." It also kept the mandatory arbitration clause.

Instagram, which allows people to add filters and effects to photos and share them easily on the Internet, was acquired by Facebook in 2012 for $715 million.

The civil lawsuit in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, is Lucy Funes, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated vs. Instagram Inc., 12-cv-6482.

© Thomson Reuters 2013

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. Dell XPS 13 With Intel Core Ultra Series 3 Processors Launched in India
  1. Amazon Great Indian Festival 2026: Best TVs Under Rs. 30,000 From Samsung, TCL, Xiaomi and More
  2. South Korea Restricts Access to KuCoin, MEXC and 25 Other Crypto Platforms
  3. Apple TV 4K (4th Generation), HomePod Mini 2 Launched in India With Siri AI: Price, Specifications
  4. Apple Launches HomeView as Its First Smart Display With Siri AI, Home Controls: Price, Specifications
  5. Sony Will Launch a Midnight Black Digital Edition PS5 in Japan Next Month
  6. Ethereum NFT Marketplace Blur Faces Closure After Volumes Crash 99 Percent
  7. Infinix GT 50 Pro Key Specifications Confirmed Ahead of October 27 India Launch
  8. Arc Raiders' Frozen Trail Update Boosts Player Count as Embark Studios Begins PvE Beta Test
  9. Binance Pulls the Curtain on Bitcoin Mining Pool, Sets November 10 Shutdown
  10. Amazon Great Indian Festival 2026: Best Deals on Premium Headphones
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.