Uber Pushes Back Against California Driver Lawsuit

Advertisement
By Reuters | Updated: 10 July 2015 09:56 IST
Uber argued on Thursday that a lawsuit filed by drivers should not proceed as a class action with the ride service citing statements of support from hundreds of other Uber drivers in a case that could decide whether they are independent contractors or employees.

Three drivers sued Uber in San Francisco federal court, contending they are employees and entitled to reimbursement for expenses, including gas and vehicle maintenance. The drivers pay those costs themselves. If allowed to proceed as a class action, the lawsuit could cover more than 160,000 California drivers.

The results of this broader legal battle could reshape the sharing economy, as companies say the contractor model allows for flexibility that many see as important to their success. An ultimate finding that drivers are employees could raise Uber's costs beyond the lawsuits' scope and force it to pay Social Security, workers' compensation, and unemployment insurance.

Advertisement

In court on Thursday, Uber in a filing cited written statements from more than 400 drivers supporting the company. At least two drivers said that if courts decided that they are Uber employees, they would not be able to work for multiple ride services.

Uber drivers "have little or nothing in common," the company argued, because they all differ significantly in the way that they engage with the company. Some hire subcontractors while others run their own transportation companies, and those differences make the case unmanageable to proceed as a single class action, the company said.

Advertisement

Shannon Liss-Riordan, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said it is "not surprising" or relevant that Uber received support from several hundred drivers. "More than a thousand drivers have contacted our firm who are very unhappy with how Uber has treated them," she said.

In previous court filings, the plaintiffs argued that Uber exercises enough control over its drivers, including the ability to terminate them, for them to be considered employees.

Advertisement

That legal similarity should be enough for the case to move forward as a class action, plaintiff attorneys said.

The case in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California is Douglas O'Connor et al vs. Uber Technologies Inc, 13-3826.

Advertisement

© Thomson Reuters 2015

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Further reading: Apps, Uber, Uber App, Uber Taxi App
Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. Nothing Phone (4b) Debuts in India, Limited RCB Edition Tags Along
  2. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8 Pre-Reservations Begin in India
  3. Moto G77 Power With a 7,000mAh Battery Arrives in India at This Price
  1. Samsung Begins Pre-Reservations for Upcoming Galaxy Z Foldables in India
  2. Skullcandy Method 360 ANC With Google Fast Pair, Sound by Bose Launched in India: Price, Specifications
  3. Meta's Smart Glasses With ‘Super Sensing’ Capabilities Reportedly Enter Prototype Testing Phase
  4. Bitcoin Consolidates Near $63,000 as Investors Await Fresh Cues
  5. WhatsApp Brings Meta Business Agent to India; Adds New Business Discovery Features
  6. Moto G77 Power Launched in India With 7,000mAh Battery, 50-Megapixel Rear Camera: Price, Specifications
  7. iPhone 18 Pro Said to Have Noticeably Thicker Aluminium Frame Compared to iPhone 17 Pro
  8. Honor Robot Phone Launch Timeline Leaked, Tipster Claims Phone Could Debut in August
  9. IO Interactive Announces Istanbul Studio Closure, Layoffs After Xbox Ends Project Fantasy Funding
  10. Redmi Note 17 Series Launch Date Revealed Along With Design, Colour Options
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.