AT&T to Pause Fibre Spending on Net Neutrality Uncertainty

Advertisement
By Reuters | Updated: 13 November 2014 12:57 IST
AT&T will stop investing in new high-speed Internet connections in 100 US cities until regulators decide whether to enact tough "net neutrality" rules proposed by President Obama, Chief Executive Officer Randall Stephenson said on Wednesday.

The investment pause is the most dramatic action yet by a telecommunications or cable company after Obama on Monday urged the Federal Communications Commission to regulate Internet service providers more like public utilities.

At the same time, AT&T had been spending heavily acquisitions and had cut its capital spending estimate for 2015.

Companies and industry groups have already protested Obama's proposal, saying it would stifle growth and investment.

Advertisement

"We can't go out and invest that kind of money deploying fibre to 100 cities not knowing under what rules those investments will be governed," Stephenson said at an analyst conference.

Advertisement

In April, AT&T said it would deploy its high-speed fibre network in 100 cities, including Chicago, Los Angeles and Miami.

A primary goal for the FCC in recent years has been to ensure quality Internet access across the country, especially in rural communities.

Advertisement

AT&T pushed back against Obama's comments on Monday and said it would take the government to court if the FCC follows through on his request.

The company, which is buying DirecTV for $48.5 billion (roughly Rs. 2,98,113 crores), said on Friday that it would also pay $1.7 billion (roughly Rs. 10,449 crores) to acquire Mexican wireless operator Iusacell. It trimmed its 2015 capital spending outlook to $18 billion (roughly Rs. 1,10,640 crores) from $21 billion (roughly Rs. 1,29,000 crores).

Advertisement

At the same conference on Wednesday, Verizon Communications Inc Chief Financial Officer Fran Shammo struck a somewhat lighter tone.

"I think the independent agency of the FCC will make the right decision," Shammo said.

He said the FCC could restrict "paid prioritization" deals, where content companies pay for faster downloads of some websites or applications, without pursuing utility-style regulations under Title II of the Telecommunications Act.

"We don't need to bring Title II into this," he said.

© Thomson Reuters 2014

 

Catch the latest from the Consumer Electronics Show on Gadgets 360, at our CES 2026 hub.

Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. CNAP vs Truecaller: Which Is Better at Identifying Spam Calls?
  2. Samsung Galaxy S26 Series Roundup: Everything That We Know So Far
  3. Mask OTT Release Date: When and Where to Watch This Action-Packed Thriller Online?
  1. Quantum Haloscope Sharpens the Search for Dark Matter Axions at Higher Frequencies
  2. Rare Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Fails Alien Test, Scientists Say
  3. CNAP vs Truecaller: How India’s Official Caller ID System Differs From the Popular App
  4. Prayagraj Ki Love Story Set to Stream Soon on Hungama OTT
  5. Mask OTT Release Date: When and Where to Watch This Action-Packed Thriller Online?
  6. New Year 2026 Custom Greetings: 5 Best AI Prompts for ChatGPT, Gemini, and Other AI Tools
  7. NASA’s Chandra Spots Champagne Cluster Formed by a Massive Galaxy Collision
  8. NASA’s Curiosity Rover Sends Stunning Sunrise-and-Sunset Holiday Postcard from Mars
  9. Oppo Find X9s Key Specifications Leaked Again; Might Also Launch in India
  10. Redmi Turbo 5, Redmi Turbo 5 Pro to Be Equipped With Upcoming MediaTek Dimensity Chips, Tipster Claims
Gadgets 360 is available in
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.