Apple Wins Dismissal of Lawsuit Over MacBook Logic Boards

Advertisement
By Reuters | Updated: 9 January 2015 09:45 IST
Apple Inc won the dismissal on Thursday of a lawsuit accusing it of defrauding consumers by selling MacBook laptop computers that contained "logic boards" it knew were defective, and which routinely failed within two years.

U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco said the plaintiffs, Uriel Marcus and Benedict Verceles, failed to show that Apple made "affirmative misrepresentations," despite citing online complaints and Apple marketing statements calling the laptops "state of the art" or the "most advanced" on the market.

"Plaintiffs have failed to allege that Apple's logic boards were unfit for their ordinary purposes or lacked a minimal level of quality," Alsup wrote. "Both plaintiffs were able to adequately use their computers for approximately 18 months and two years, respectively."

Alsup gave the plaintiffs until Jan. 22 to amend their lawsuit, which sought class-action status, against the Cupertino, California-based company.

Advertisement

Omar Rosales, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Apple did not immediately respond to a similar request.

Advertisement

The plaintiffs claimed that Apple's sale of MacBooks since May 20, 2010, violated consumer protection laws in California and Texas, where the lawsuit began last May before being moved.

They also contended that Apple Chief Executive Tim Cook was told about the defective logic boards in 2011, but did nothing.

Advertisement

Logic boards contain computer circuitry and are sometimes known as motherboards.

A separate and still pending lawsuit in California accuses Apple of defrauding consumers by selling MacBook Pro laptops in 2011 that contained defective graphic cards, causing screen distortions and system failures.

Advertisement

MacBooks are part of Apple's Mac line of desktop and laptop computers. The company reported unit sales in that business of 18.91 million in its latest fiscal year.

The case is Marcus et al v. Apple Inc, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 14-03824.

© Thomson Reuters 2015

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Further reading: Apple, Laptops, MacBook, PC
Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. Realme C83 5G Debuts in India With a 7,000mAh Battery at This Price
  2. Here's When the Poco C85x 5G Will be Launched in India
  3. OpenAI's GPT-5.4 AI Model Is Here, and It Can Use Your Computer
  4. OnePlus 15T Key Specifications Confirmed Ahead of Launch in China
  5. This AI Device Claims to Stop Microphones From Recording Your Voice
  6. Poco X8 Pro Max Visits Geekbench as Company Finally Confirms Chip Details
  7. Google Pixel 10a Review: More of the Same?
  1. Vivo X300 Max With Zeiss Cameras and Android 16 Spotted at MWC 2026, Could Launch Soon
  2. WhatsApp Update Introduces Support for Discovering Stickers While Typing Emoji: How It Works
  3. This AI-Powered Portable Device Claims to Detect Microphones and Jam Audio Recordings
  4. Poco X8 Pro Series Global Launch Date Leaked Ahead of Anticipated Debut: Expected Price, Specifications
  5. MacBook Neo Geekbench Scores Indicate It Performs on Par With iPhone 16 Pro Max
  6. Xiaomi Testing Experimental AI Agent Miclaw, Can Perform Complex Tasks Across Devices
  7. Dear Radhi OTT Release: Where to Watch the Tamil Thriller Online?
  8. With Love Now Streaming on Netflix: Know Everything About Plot, Cast, and More
  9. Kaattaan OTT Release Date Confirmed: When and Where to Watch Vijay Sethupathi Starrer Online?
  10. OnePlus 15T Display Size, Ultrasonic Fingerprint Sensor Confirmed; Geekbench Listing Hints at Chip, Memory
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.