Google Defeats Zombie Go Boom 'Adpocalypse' Lawsuit

Advertisement
By Reuters | Updated: 9 March 2018 10:34 IST
Highlights
  • YouTube had dropped the placement of clients' advertisements
  • Placement was dropped on videos that viewers might deem violent
  • The plaintiffs said that YouTube made the changes without warning

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit challenging a decision by Google's YouTube service to drop the placement of clients' advertisements on videos that viewers might deem violent or offensive.

US District Judge Edward Chen in San Francisco ruled on Wednesday that YouTube, which had faced pressure from major advertisers, had discretion under its contract with operators of the Zombie Go Boom channel and other content providers to restrict ad placements.

Advertisement

The plaintiffs, whose channel has 1.78 million subscribers, said in their proposed class action that YouTube made the changes, which some commentators dubbed "Adpocalypse," last March without warning or permission.

They said this caused ad revenue to fall 90 to 95 percent, to as little as $20 a day, in connection with videos with such titles as "Donald Trump Zombie Kill Part 1!" and "Can an Xbox Kill a Zombie?" that they called "a cross between popular cable TV shows 'Mythbusters' and 'The Walking Dead.'"

But the judge said the contract made clear that YouTube, part of Mountain View, California-based Alphabet, was "not obligated to display any advertisements" alongside videos.

He also said Zombie Go Boom, based in Fayetteville, Arkansas, got something out of the arrangement: the ability to post videos for free, in exchange for giving YouTube a license to its content.

Advertisement

"The ability to post videos, even without advertising revenue, can be valuable to content providers in reaching a wide audience," Chen wrote.

Lawyers for Zombie Go Boom did not immediately respond on Thursday to requests for comment. Google did not immediately respond to a similar request.

Advertisement

YouTube changed its ad placement algorithm after companies such as AT&T, Johnson & Johnson, JPMorgan Chase & Co, Verizon Communications and Britain's Marks & Spencer Group suspended digital ads on concern YouTube was not doing enough to keep their ads away from offensive videos, including hate speech.

The case is Sweet et al v Google Inc et al, US District Court, Northern District of California, No. 17-03953.

Advertisement

© Thomson Reuters 2018

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Further reading: Internet, Google, Alphabet, Adpocalypse, YouTube
Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. Amazon Great Indian Festival 2026: Best Deals on OnePlus Products
  2. Oppo Pad Mini Matte Display Edition, Enco X4 Set to Launch on This Date
  1. Rockstar Explains Why It Took Over 8 Years to Make GTA 6, Says It Will Make Its Next Game Faster
  2. Facebook Introduces Your Algorithm Feature to Let Users Customise Feed and Reels
  3. Solana’s Alpenglow Upgrade Set for October 21 With 150-Millisecond Finality Target
  4. Haier In-Vista Five-Door Refrigerator and M3 Series Washing Machine Launched in India: Price, Features
  5. Oppo Pad Mini Matte Display Edition, Enco X4 India Launch Date Announced
  6. Samsung Galaxy S27 Ultra to Launch Next Year With an Improved Privacy Display, Higher Price Tag, Tipster Claims
  7. Samsung Announces Festive Offers on Vision AI TVs in India With Free Soundbars, Cashback Benefits
  8. Standard Chartered Broadens UAE Crypto Services With Direct Bitcoin and Ethereum Trading
  9. Google Play Store Adds Vibe-Coded Apps, AI App Comparisons and Personalised Game Discovery
  10. Ripple Teams Up With Stripe’s Privy to Enable XRP Payments in Apps
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.