Tesla Autopilot Design Cited by NTSB as Factor in 2018 California Crash

Tesla Autopilot's design "permitted the driver to disengage from the driving task," NTSB said.

Advertisement
By Reuters | Updated: 5 September 2019 16:05 IST

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) on Wednesday cited driver errors and Tesla's Autopilot design as the probable cause of a January 2018 crash of a Model S into a parked fire truck on a highway in California.

The safety board, which previously criticised Tesla's driver assistance system Autopilot after a 2016 fatal crash in Florida, said that the system's design "permitted the driver to disengage from the driving task" in the Culver City, California, crash. The NTSB said on Tuesday that Autopilot allowed the driver to keep his hands off the wheel for the vast majority of the nearly 14 minutes of the trip.

The fire truck was unoccupied and the driver was not injured in the incident. The NTSB cited the driver's "inattention and overreliance" on the advanced driver assistance system.

Advertisement

Tesla's Autopilot was engaged during at least three fatal US crashes, including one involving a 2018 Model 3 in Delray Beach, Florida, and a crash in Mountain View, California, of a Model X. Both incidents, which occurred in March 2018, remain under investigation by the NTSB and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The NTSB makes safety recommendations, while the NHTSA can order a recall if it deems a defect poses an unreasonable risk to safety.

Advertisement

The Center for Auto Safety, a consumer watchdog group, said on Wednesday the NTSB report should prompt NHTSA to "do its job and recall these vehicles ... A vehicle that enables a driver to not pay attention, or fall asleep, while accelerating into a parked fire truck is defective and dangerous."

NHTSA did not immediately comment.

Tesla said in an emailed statement that since the 2018 crash "we have made updates to our system including adjusting the time intervals between hands-on warnings and the conditions under which they're activated."

Advertisement

The company added that Tesla owners have driven billions of miles with Autopilot engaged and says its data "indicates that drivers using Autopilot remain safer than those operating without assistance."

The crashes raised questions about the driver-assistance system's ability to detect hazards and sparked safety concerns about systems that can perform driving tasks for extended stretches of time with little or no human intervention, but which cannot completely replace human drivers.

Advertisement

After the fatal 2016 Florida crash, NTSB asked six automakers with advanced driver assistance systems - Tesla, Volkswagen AG, BMW AG, Nissan Motor, Daimler AG and Volvo Car - to "develop applications to more effectively sense the driver's level of engagement and alert the driver when engagement is lacking while automated vehicle control systems are in use."

"All manufacturers except Tesla have responded to the NTSB explaining their current systems and their efforts to reduce misuse and keep drivers engaged," the NTSB said.

While Tesla drivers say they are able to avoid holding the steering wheel for extended periods while using Autopilot, Tesla advises drivers to keep their hands on the wheel and pay attention while using the system.

The 2014 Model S Autopilot system was engaged continuously for the final 13 minutes 48 seconds of the January 2018 trip and the driver kept his hands off the wheel for all but 51 seconds of the final drive segment and received numerous alerts to place his hands back on the wheel, the NTSB said. Had he been paying close attention "he could have taken evasive action to avoid or mitigate the collision."

© Thomson Reuters 2019

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Further reading: NTSB, Tesla
Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. DoT's SIM Binding Rule Explained: How Messaging Apps Will Verify Users
  2. Here's When the Poco C85x 5G Will be Launched in India
  3. WhatsApp Now Lets You Discover Stickers While Typing Emoji
  4. Poco X8 Pro Max Visits Geekbench as Company Finally Confirms Chip Details
  5. Realme C83 5G Debuts in India With a 7,000mAh Battery at This Price
  6. Vivo X300 Max With Zeiss Cameras Spied at MWC 2026, Could Launch Soon
  7. Vivo X300 Ultra's Telephoto Camera Confirmed to Offer CIPA 7.0 Stabilisation
  8. Google Pixel 10a Review: More of the Same?
  1. Vivo X300 Max With Zeiss Cameras and Android 16 Spotted at MWC 2026, Could Launch Soon
  2. WhatsApp Update Introduces Support for Discovering Stickers While Typing Emoji: How It Works
  3. This AI-Powered Portable Device Claims to Detect Microphones and Jam Audio Recordings
  4. Poco X8 Pro Series Global Launch Date Leaked Ahead of Anticipated Debut: Expected Price, Specifications
  5. MacBook Neo Geekbench Scores Indicate It Performs on Par With iPhone 16 Pro Max
  6. Xiaomi Testing Experimental AI Agent Miclaw, Can Perform Complex Tasks Across Devices
  7. Dear Radhi OTT Release: Where to Watch the Tamil Thriller Online?
  8. With Love Now Streaming on Netflix: Know Everything About Plot, Cast, and More
  9. Kaattaan OTT Release Date Confirmed: When and Where to Watch Vijay Sethupathi Starrer Online?
  10. OnePlus 15T Display Size, Ultrasonic Fingerprint Sensor Confirmed; Geekbench Listing Hints at Chip, Memory
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.