Activity Trackers May Overestimate Sleep Time: Study

Advertisement
By Indo-Asian News Service | Updated: 28 December 2015 18:57 IST
Wearable activity trackers that promise to monitor physical activity, sleep and other behaviours may be good at counting steps but bad at measuring sleep, says a new study.

"Wearable devices that track physical activity, sleep and other behaviours are growing significantly in popularity," said study co-author Robert Furberg from RTI International, a nonprofit organisation based in North Carolina, US.

The researchers conducted a systematic review of 22 published articles researching the ability of Fitbit and Jawbone two popular activity trackers to measure steps, distance, physical activity, calories and sleep.

Several studies indicated that the step counting feature was accurate both in the lab and in the field. Only one study assessed distance tracking for the Fitbit, finding that the device tends to over-estimate at slower speeds and under-estimate at faster speeds.

Advertisement

Two field-based studies compared accelerometry-assessed physical activity to results from the trackers, with one study finding high correlation while another study noted a wide range in correlation.

Advertisement

Using several different comparison measures, other researchers found that both tracker brands underestimated calories used, and overestimated total sleep time.

Overall, the new study indicated higher validity of step counting, and lower validity for calories (energy expenditure) and sleep.

Advertisement

To make trackers as accurate as possible, the authors suggested that the users should wear the tracker in the same position each day.

Enter personal details like height and weight correctly at initial set-up, and update if there is significant change in weight, the researchers said.

Advertisement

Correctly calibrate the length of a walking stride, add more information via the device's journal function, and interact with the sleep mode settings, they suggested.

"When researching information on the trackers, we learned several tips users may be able to implement to make their tracker more accurate," study lead author Kelly Evenson, professor at University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health in the US, pointed out.

The findings appeared in the International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Further reading: Fitbit, Jawbone, Wearables
Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. Realme C83 5G Debuts in India With a 7,000mAh Battery at This Price
  2. OTT Releases This Week: Gandhi Talks, Subedaar, War Machine, Hello Bachhon, and More
  1. Vivo X300 Max With Zeiss Cameras and Android 16 Spotted at MWC 2026, Could Launch Soon
  2. WhatsApp Update Introduces Support for Discovering Stickers While Typing Emoji: How It Works
  3. This AI-Powered Portable Device Claims to Detect Microphones and Jam Audio Recordings
  4. Poco X8 Pro Series Global Launch Date Leaked Ahead of Anticipated Debut: Expected Price, Specifications
  5. MacBook Neo Geekbench Scores Indicate It Performs on Par With iPhone 16 Pro Max
  6. Xiaomi Testing Experimental AI Agent Miclaw, Can Perform Complex Tasks Across Devices
  7. Dear Radhi OTT Release: Where to Watch the Tamil Thriller Online?
  8. With Love Now Streaming on Netflix: Know Everything About Plot, Cast, and More
  9. Kaattaan OTT Release Date Confirmed: When and Where to Watch Vijay Sethupathi Starrer Online?
  10. OnePlus 15T Display Size, Ultrasonic Fingerprint Sensor Confirmed; Geekbench Listing Hints at Chip, Memory
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.