Disney, Universal Sue Image Creator Midjourney for Copyright Infringement

Disney and Universal claim in the lawsuit that the San Francisco company rebuffed their request to stop infringing their copyrighted works.

Advertisement
By Reuters | Updated: 12 June 2025 14:41 IST
Highlights
  • Midjourney has been accused of releasing infringed images
  • Midjourney recreates animated images from a typed request, or prompt
  • The image generator recreated characters from Universal Studios, Disney

Disney and Universal have asked for a preliminary injunction to stop Midjourney from copying their works

Photo Credit: Reuters

Walt Disney and Comcast's Universal filed a copyright lawsuit against Midjourney on Wednesday, calling its popular AI-powered image generator a "bottomless pit of plagiarism" for its use of the studios' best-known characters.

The suit, filed in federal district court in Los Angeles, claims Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios, making and distributing without permission "innumerable" copies of characters such as Darth Vader from "Star Wars," Elsa from "Frozen," and the Minions from "Despicable Me".

Advertisement

Spokespeople for Midjourney did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 

Horacio Gutierrez, Disney's executive vice president and chief legal officer, said in a statement: "We are bullish on the promise of AI technology and optimistic about how it can be used responsibly as a tool to further human creativity, but piracy is piracy, and the fact that it's done by an AI company does not make it any less infringing."

Advertisement

NBCUniversal Executive Vice President and General Counsel Kim Harris said the company was suing to "protect the hard work of all the artists whose work entertains and inspires us and the significant investment we make in our content."

The film industry trade group Motion Picture Association expressed support for the lawsuit and called for AI companies to respect intellectual property rights.

Advertisement

"Strong copyright protection is the backbone of our industry," MPA chairman Charles Rivkin said in a statement. "A balanced approach to AI that both protects intellectual property and embraces responsible, human-centered innovation is critical for maintaining America's global leadership in creative industries."

The studios claim in the lawsuit that the San Francisco company rebuffed their request to stop infringing their copyrighted works or, at a minimum, take technological measures to halt the creation of these AI-generated characters.

Advertisement

Instead, the studios argue, Midjourney continued to release new versions of its AI image service that boast higher quality infringing images.

Midjourney recreates animated images from a typed request, or prompt.

In the suit filed by seven corporate entities at the studios that own or control copyrights for the various Disney and Universal Pictures film units, the studios offered examples of Midjourney animations that include Disney characters, such as Yoda wielding a lightsaber, Bart Simpson riding a skateboard, Marvel's Iron Man soaring above the clouds and Pixar's Buzz Lightyear taking flight.

The image generator also recreated such Universal characters as "How to Train Your Dragon's" dragon, Toothless, the green ogre "Shrek," and Po from "Kung Fu Panda." 

"By helping itself to plaintiffs' copyrighted works, and then distributing images (and soon videos) that blatantly incorporate and copy Disney's and Universal's famous characters -- without investing a penny in their creation -- Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism," the suit alleges.

"Midjourney's infringement is calculated and willful," it said.

Big Scrape of the Internet

Disney and Universal asked the court for a preliminary injunction, to prevent Midjourney from copying their works, or offering its image- or video-generation service without protections against infringement. The studios also seek unspecified damages.

The suit alleges Midjourney used the studios' works to train its image service and generate reproductions of their copyrighted characters. The company, founded in 2021 by David Holz, monetizes the service through paid subscriptions and generated $300 million in revenue last year, the studios said.

This is not the first time Midjourney has been accused of misusing artists' work to train their AI systems.

A year ago, a California federal judge found that 10 artists behind a copyright infringement suit against Midjourney, Stability AI and other companies had plausibly argued these AI companies had copied and stored their work on company servers, and could be liable for using it without permission.

That ruling allowed the lawsuit over the unauthorized use of images to proceed. It is in the process of litigation.

The cases are part of a wave of lawsuits brought by copyright owners including authors, news outlets and record labels against tech companies over their use of copyrighted materials for AI training without permission. 

In a 2022 interview with Forbes, Midjourney CEO Holz said he built the company's database by performing "a big scrape of the Internet."

Asked whether he sought consent of the artists whose work was covered by copyright, he responded, "there isn't really a way to get a hundred million images and know where they're coming from."

© Thomson Reuters 2025

(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Further reading: disney, comcast, universal, midjourney, AI
Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. Vivo T5 5G Key Specifications Confirmed Ahead of September 2 India Launch
  2. Boltt Ace 5G, Evo Software Support Confirmed Ahead of September 1 Sale
  3. PhonePe Launches UPI 123Pay for Feature Phones Across India
  4. Samsung Galaxy S26 FE Will Go on Sale in India Soon, Microsites Confirm
  5. Here's Why the Google Pixel 11 Series Will Not Get GrapheneOS
  1. Xiaomi Pad 9 Pro Max Appears on Geekbench With Xring O3 Chip
  2. Philips 5G Smartphone India Launch Date Confirmed: Here’s What We Know
  3. Boltt Reveals Software Update Policy for Ace 5G and Evo Ahead of September 1 Sale
  4. Samsung Galaxy Tab S12 Ultra Allegedly Listed on Geekbench With MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Chipset
  5. NPCI to Soon Allow Users to Port UPI AutoPay Mandates Across Digital Payments Platforms: Report
  6. PhonePe UPI 123Pay Enables UPI Payments Without Internet on Feature Phones in India
  7. Vivo T5 5G Key Specifications Teased; 7,050mAh Battery, Dual Rear Cameras Confirmed
  8. Anthropic’s Claude Closes 85 Percent of AI Safety Gap in Automated Research Test
  9. OpenClaw 2.0 Released as Biggest Update Since Launch; Brings Shared Cloud Sessions, Smarter Automations
  10. Samsung Galaxy S26 FE Set to Go on Sale in India Soon as Multiple Microsites Go Live
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.