Samsung Fights $520 Million India Tax Demand, Points to Reliance Practice

Tax authorities in January asked Samsung to pay $520 million (roughly Rs. 4,381 crore) for evading the 10-20 percent tariffs.

Advertisement
By Reuters | Updated: 5 May 2025 15:16 IST
Highlights
  • Samsung argues that the tax authority hurriedly passed the order
  • It's not clear if Samsung employees are separately challenging the fines
  • Samsung is one of the largest players in the consumer electronics market

The tax demand shows a substantial chunk of Samsung's last year's India profit of $955 million

Photo Credit: Gadgets 360

Samsung has asked an Indian tribunal to quash a $520 million (roughly Rs. 4,381 crore) tax demand for allegedly misclassifying imports of networking gear, arguing officials were aware of the practice as India's Reliance imported the same component in a similar manner for years, documents show.

Samsung becomes the second major foreign company in recent months to challenge an Indian tax demand.

Volkswagen has sued Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government in court for a record demand of $1.4 billion (roughly Rs. 11,797 crore) for misclassifying its component imports.

Advertisement

In the Samsung case, tax authorities in January asked Samsung to pay $520 million (roughly Rs. 4,381 crore) for evading the 10-20 percent tariffs by misclassifying imports of a key mobile tower equipment, which it then sold to billionaire Mukesh Ambani's telecom giant, Reliance Jio, from 2018 to 2021.

In its 281-page challenge at the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in Mumbai, Samsung criticises Indian authorities for being "fully aware" of the business model as Reliance had a "long-established practice" of importing the same equipment without any tariff payments for three years until 2017.

Advertisement

Samsung's India unit says it discovered during an Indian tax investigation that Reliance had been warned about the practice way back in 2017, but Reliance did not inform the South Korean company about it and tax officials never questioned Samsung.

"The classification adopted by the appellant (Samsung) was known to the authorities, however the same was never questioned ... Department was fully aware," Samsung says in its April 17 filing, which is not public but was seen by Reuters.

Advertisement

"Reliance Jio officials did not inform" Samsung about the tax warning of 2017, it adds.

Samsung and India's tax authority did not respond to Reuters queries.

Advertisement

Further details of Reliance's 2017 warning from tax authorities are not public and were not disclosed in the Samsung filing. Reliance didn't respond to Reuters queries.

Other than $520 million (roughly Rs. 4,381 crore) demand Samsung faces, Indian authorities have also imposed an $81 million (roughly Rs. 682 crore) fine on seven of its employees, taking the total tax demand to $601 million (roughly Rs. 5,066 crore). It's not clear if Samsung employees are separately challenging the fines.

The tax demand represents a substantial chunk of last year's net profit of $955 million (roughly Rs. 8,050 crore) for Samsung in India, where it is one of the largest players in the consumer electronics and smartphones market.

In defending its tariff declarations, Samsung also argues in its filing that the tax authority passed the order in January "in a hurry" and it was not provided "a fair opportunity" to present its case, despite the "huge stakes" involved.

The Samsung case concerns imports of a component called "Remote Radio Head", a radio-frequency circuit enclosed in a small outdoor module, that tax officials say is "one of the most important" parts of 4G telecoms systems.

The case against Samsung alleges it misclassified the component's imports worth $784 million (roughly Rs. 6,609 crore) from Korea and Vietnam between 2018 to 2021, to maximise profits.

Investigators found that Samsung "transgressed all business ethics and industry practices or standards in order to achieve their sole motive of maximising their profit by defrauding the government exchequer," the January order stated.

© Thomson Reuters 2025

(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Further reading: Samsung, Reliance, Volkswagen, India
Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: Price in India, Specs Compared
  1. NASA Tests Solar-Powered System to Extract Oxygen from Lunar Soil
  2. Black Phone 2 Now Streaming on JioHotstar: Everything You Need to Know
  3. Hello Bachhon OTT Release Date: When and Where to Watch This Thriller Online?
  4. Mad For Each Other OTT Release: Know Everything About This Upcoming Couple Reality Show
  5. Sri Chidambaram Garu Now Streaming Online: What You Need to Know
  6. The Bluff Now Available for Streaming Online: What You Need to Know About Priyanka Chopra Jonas Starrer Online?
  7. 3 Roses Season 2 Now Available for Streaming Online: What You Need to Know About Cast, Plot, and Where to Watch
  8. Vanaveera Now Streaming on Prime Video: Know Everything About This Telugu Action-Drama Online
  9. Xiaomi Pad 8 Launched Globally With 11.2-inch LCD Screen, Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 Chip: Price, Specifications
  10. Xiaomi 17 Ultra Launched Globally With 200-Megapixel Persicope Camera Alongside Xiaomi 17: Price, Specifications
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.