Samsung Fights $520 Million India Tax Demand, Points to Reliance Practice

Tax authorities in January asked Samsung to pay $520 million (roughly Rs. 4,381 crore) for evading the 10-20 percent tariffs.

Advertisement
By Reuters | Updated: 5 May 2025 15:16 IST
Highlights
  • Samsung argues that the tax authority hurriedly passed the order
  • It's not clear if Samsung employees are separately challenging the fines
  • Samsung is one of the largest players in the consumer electronics market

The tax demand shows a substantial chunk of Samsung's last year's India profit of $955 million

Photo Credit: Gadgets 360

Samsung has asked an Indian tribunal to quash a $520 million (roughly Rs. 4,381 crore) tax demand for allegedly misclassifying imports of networking gear, arguing officials were aware of the practice as India's Reliance imported the same component in a similar manner for years, documents show.

Samsung becomes the second major foreign company in recent months to challenge an Indian tax demand.

Advertisement

Volkswagen has sued Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government in court for a record demand of $1.4 billion (roughly Rs. 11,797 crore) for misclassifying its component imports.

In the Samsung case, tax authorities in January asked Samsung to pay $520 million (roughly Rs. 4,381 crore) for evading the 10-20 percent tariffs by misclassifying imports of a key mobile tower equipment, which it then sold to billionaire Mukesh Ambani's telecom giant, Reliance Jio, from 2018 to 2021.

In its 281-page challenge at the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in Mumbai, Samsung criticises Indian authorities for being "fully aware" of the business model as Reliance had a "long-established practice" of importing the same equipment without any tariff payments for three years until 2017.

Advertisement

Samsung's India unit says it discovered during an Indian tax investigation that Reliance had been warned about the practice way back in 2017, but Reliance did not inform the South Korean company about it and tax officials never questioned Samsung.

"The classification adopted by the appellant (Samsung) was known to the authorities, however the same was never questioned ... Department was fully aware," Samsung says in its April 17 filing, which is not public but was seen by Reuters.

Advertisement

"Reliance Jio officials did not inform" Samsung about the tax warning of 2017, it adds.

Samsung and India's tax authority did not respond to Reuters queries.

Advertisement

Further details of Reliance's 2017 warning from tax authorities are not public and were not disclosed in the Samsung filing. Reliance didn't respond to Reuters queries.

Other than $520 million (roughly Rs. 4,381 crore) demand Samsung faces, Indian authorities have also imposed an $81 million (roughly Rs. 682 crore) fine on seven of its employees, taking the total tax demand to $601 million (roughly Rs. 5,066 crore). It's not clear if Samsung employees are separately challenging the fines.

The tax demand represents a substantial chunk of last year's net profit of $955 million (roughly Rs. 8,050 crore) for Samsung in India, where it is one of the largest players in the consumer electronics and smartphones market.

In defending its tariff declarations, Samsung also argues in its filing that the tax authority passed the order in January "in a hurry" and it was not provided "a fair opportunity" to present its case, despite the "huge stakes" involved.

The Samsung case concerns imports of a component called "Remote Radio Head", a radio-frequency circuit enclosed in a small outdoor module, that tax officials say is "one of the most important" parts of 4G telecoms systems.

The case against Samsung alleges it misclassified the component's imports worth $784 million (roughly Rs. 6,609 crore) from Korea and Vietnam between 2018 to 2021, to maximise profits.

Investigators found that Samsung "transgressed all business ethics and industry practices or standards in order to achieve their sole motive of maximising their profit by defrauding the government exchequer," the January order stated.

© Thomson Reuters 2025

(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Further reading: Samsung, Reliance, Volkswagen, India
Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. Smartwatches, Other Wearables Now Exempt From This EU Battery Rule
  2. Airtel Unlimited 5G Data Subscribers Reportedly Cannot Share 5G Data via Mobile Hotspot
  3. Oppo K15 Launch Date Confirmed; Key Specifications Revealed Ahead of Debut
  1. Redmi Note 17 Pro Global Variant Reportedly Appears on NBD Database Alongside Poco Model
  2. Google Pixel 11a Codename Reportedly Spotted in Phone App
  3. Huawei Mate XT 2 Leaked Patent Reveals New Tri-Fold Design and Folding Mechanism
  4. Airtel Unlimited 5G Data Subscribers Reportedly Cannot Share 5G Data via Mobile Hotspot: Here's What We Know So Far
  5. Lenovo Legion C700 Teased as a Cloud Gaming Handheld Ahead of August Launch
  6. Marvel's Wolverine Gets New Trailer That Will Play Ahead of Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey in Select Theatres
  7. Airtel Quietly Removes Rs. 549 Individual Postpaid Plan in India; Rs. 699 Plan Becomes Next Upgrade
  8. Poco M8 Power, Poco X8 India Launch Timeline Tipped; Could Arrive as Rebranded Redmi Note 17 Series
  9. Samsung Galaxy S25 Series Could Get Galaxy S26’s Horizontal Lock Camera Feature With One UI 9 Update
  10. Asus Pad India Launch Date Announced as Company Reveals Key Specifications
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.