Elon Musk Said to Admit Tesla’s Mistake to Car Crash Victim’s Father

Elon Musk said to accept that Tesla technicians shouldn’t have removed the speed limiter without the father’s authorisation.

Advertisement
By Malathi Nayak, Bloomberg | Updated: 8 July 2022 18:36 IST
Highlights
  • Musk said, Well, I guess we shouldn’t have taken the limiter off
  • James Riley was the registered owner of the car
  • Miner said failure to communicate with the parents made the difference

Tesla technicians shouldn’t have removed the speed limiter, according to the lawyer

Photo Credit: Reuters

Elon Musk told the father of a teenager who died in a Tesla Model S crash that the carmaker made a mistake in removing a speed limiter from the vehicle without the father's permission, a lawyer for the family said in court.

Curtis Miner, the attorney, told a jury Thursday that the billionaire chief executive officer of Tesla Inc. made a “critical confession” when James Riley asked him in a May 2018 phone conversation how a device that was supposed to prevent the vehicle from going faster than 85 miles per hour (roughly 137km per hour) was removed before 18-year-old Barrett Riley veered off a Florida road at 116 miles per hour (roughly 186km per hour) and hit a wall.

Advertisement

After confirming that James Riley, through his company, was the registered owner of the car, Musk said Tesla technicians shouldn't have removed the speed limiter without his authorisation, according to the lawyer's account of the phone call.

“Well, I guess we shouldn't have taken the limiter off,” Riley recalled Musk saying when he took the witness stand to testify against Tesla. Riley said the CEO told him that Tesla would review its policies.

Advertisement

In his opening argument at a trial that's scheduled to run through next week in federal court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Miner said the company's failure to communicate with Barrett's parents made all the difference.

“If Tesla had taken the most simplest steps to tell Jim and Jenny Riley what they'd done,” this accident wouldn't have happened, he said.

Advertisement

The negligence case is the first for the world's most valuable automaker over a fatal crash involving one of its vehicles. The electric car-maker faces a flurry of lawsuits over accidents blamed on its Autopilot driver-assistance feature that have also drawn increasing scrutiny from safety regulators.

Tesla's attorney presented a very different narrative to the six-person jury.

Advertisement

“A speed limiter is not a safety device,” Vince Galvin said. “Is it all right if they crash at 85 mph instead of 116 mph?”

Tesla has said that Barrett Riley went in person to the Tesla facility where the Model S was being serviced and “tricked” its staff into removing the speed limiter.

“Tesla is not in a position to police the Rileys' children,” Galvin said.

Galvin disputed what happened on the phone call between Musk and Riley. Musk isn't a witness in the case.

“If Musk told him they something did something wrong,” Riley would have told the National Transportation Safety Board that during the agency's investigation of the accident, but he “disclosed nothing,” the lawyer said.

Galvin said Barrett was known among friends and family for driving “recklessly” and “dangerously.” His mother urged his friends to stop him from speeding, saying she was worried for their safety, the lawyer said.

“The Rileys negligently entrusted their vehicle to Barrett because they knew and should have known he had driving issues,” Galvin said.

© 2022 Bloomberg L.P.


What are the best tablets? We discuss this on Orbital, the Gadgets 360 podcast. Orbital is available on Spotify, Gaana, JioSaavn, Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music and wherever you get your podcasts.
Affiliate links may be automatically generated - see our ethics statement for details.
 

Get your daily dose of tech news, reviews, and insights, in under 80 characters on Gadgets 360 Turbo. Connect with fellow tech lovers on our Forum. Follow us on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News for instant updates. Catch all the action on our YouTube channel.

Further reading: EV, Elon Musk, Tesla
Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra Could Cost More Than Expected, Listing Suggests
  2. Samsung Galaxy A55, Galaxy A35 One UI 9 Internal Testing Begins, Leak Suggests
  3. Samsung Announces 'Back to School' Deals Across These Devices in India
  4. Google's Fitbit Air Spotted on Amazon India Ahead of Official Launch
  5. Dell Alienware 16X Aurora Launched in India Alongside Alienware Area-51 Series
  6. Redmi Note 17 Pro Max Listed on NBTC Website Ahead of Imminent Launch
  7. Samsung Galaxy Watch 9 Leak Reveals Major Chipset Upgrade Before Galaxy Unpacked
  8. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G Sale Begins in India Today
  9. iOS 27 Beta Code Reportedly Reveals a Key Detail About the Foldable iPhone
  1. OnePlus 11, Nord 4, and Newer Models Tipped to Receive the Android 17-Based ColorOS 17 Update in India
  2. Redmi Note 17 Pro Max Appears on Thailand's NBTC Certification Database, Might Launch Soon
  3. Apple’s First Foldable iPhone Reportedly Appears in iOS 27 Beta Code With a Multi-Battery Setup
  4. X for Android App Undergoes Major Design Overhaul, Enhanced Performance and Reliability
  5. Samsung Galaxy Buds Able to Reportedly Skip Galaxy Unpacked Launch; Could Debut in October
  6. Dell Alienware 16X Aurora, Alienware 16 Area-51 and Alienware 18 Area-51 Launched in India: Price, Specifications
  7. Samsung Galaxy A55, Galaxy A35 One UI 9 Test Builds Reportedly Spotted Ahead of Android 17 Rollout
  8. Xiaomi Pad 9 Could Launch Soon With a Bigger Battery, Certification Listing Suggests: Expected Specifications
  9. Redmi 17 4G EPREL Certification Listing Gives an Early Look at Its Specifications
  10. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G Goes on Sale in India With Dimensity 7400 Ultimate SoC: Price, Offers
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.